+1

On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <moser...@gmail.com> wrote:

    +1 from me, sounds great.
    
    
    On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda <ab...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
    
    > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
    >
    > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <aldrinp...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
    >
    >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days to see if
    > there
    >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file the ticket
    > around
    >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end of next week
    > to
    >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
    >
    >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
    >     >
    >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <mikerthom...@gmail.com>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >
    >     > > +1
    >     > >
    >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
    > sivaprasanna...@gmail.com>
    >     > > wrote:
    >     > >
    >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
    >     > > >
    >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
    >     > > >
    >     > > >
    >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <jvw...@gmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >     > > >
    >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
    >     > > > >
    >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
    > kdoran.apa...@gmail.com>
    >     > > wrote:
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > > +1
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <alopre...@apache.org>
    > wrote:
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > >    +1.
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
    >     > > > > >    alopre...@apache.org
    >     > > > > >    alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
    >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4  BACE 3C6E F65B
    > 2F7D
    >     > > EF69
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
    > aldrinp...@gmail.com>
    >     > > > wrote:
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about the
    > deprecation
    >     > of
    >     > > > our
    >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the canonical repos 
that
    >     > > > committers
    >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to GitHub) and
    >     > > > transitioning
    >     > > > > to
    >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be an optional
    > change,
    >     > > > only
    >     > > > > in
    >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous discussion
    > over
    >     > this
    >     > > > > topic
    >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I think some
    > of the
    >     > > > > logistics
    >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual request to do so
    > was
    >     > never
    >     > > > > >> executed.
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early relocation.  The
    > process
    >     > > > > looks to
    >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately only result
    > in
    >     > > > requiring
    >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original git-wip 
based
    >     > > remotes.
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the requisite
    > INFRA
    >     > ticket
    >     > > > and
    >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the community
    > to make
    >     > > > this
    >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the choice to
    > perform
    >     > this
    >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu of the mass
    >     > > migration
    >     > > > > that
    >     > > > > >> would happen later.
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it is a nice
    > bit of
    >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our open PRs and,
    > given
    >     > my
    >     > > > > prior
    >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it happen.
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> --aldrin
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > > >> [1]
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > >
    >     > > >
    >     > >
    >     >
    > 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
    >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
    >     > > > > >> [3]
    >     > > > > >>
    >     > > > >
    >     > > >
    >     > >
    >     >
    > 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > > >
    >     > > > >
    >     > > >
    >     > >
    >     >
    >
    >
    >
    

Reply via email to