Maybe good to check the link on the NiFi website (Development --> Source). It still points out to "https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git";
Raymond Op vr 14 dec. 2018 om 15:13 schreef Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com>: > And in my frenzied typing, I made use of nifi-site's locations instead of > NiFi. > > NiFi is available at Gitbox for checkout at > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git with its web view at > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:23 AM Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Some clarifying notes until I can get all the updates into place and > > generate a new email. > > > > There are now two locations that are writable by committers for each of > > our repositories. The updated repository locations can be seen in the > > Apache NiFi section of https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf. NiFi, for > > instance, is available at > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi-site.git. The web view of the > > repository is located at > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi-site.git. Please note the > > subtle distinction! > > > > If you are a contributor still on their way to committership or you are > > committer content with the same functionality we had with our old setup > > (git-wip), you will use the above listed locations. You can update your > > location by performing the following steps: > > > > - Go to the root of your source directory, we'll use nifi as an > example > > - cd ${repo_home}/nifi > > - Update your remote. On a default checkout this will be origin, but > > use the name that is pointing to the old git-wip location (you can > view > > these using git remote -v) > > - git remote set-url origin > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git > > > > > > If you are a committer and interested in making use of the tighter GitHub > > integration, there are a few steps needed to enable this described at > > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/. Please follow those and give some > time > > to allow the background processes sync. Successfully completing them > > should result in the email from GitHub on behalf of Gitbox I mentioned > > previously. > > > > Again, look for a bit more polished set of instructions in the next hour > > or so but feel free to add any questions here in the interim if it is > > holding you up. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:35 AM Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hey all, > >> > >> Just a quick note that migration has completed. I'll be gathering up > >> information shortly and sending out another, separate email to the > >> community with any needed changes and will work to update our docs > >> appropriately. > >> > >> Committers, you should have received an email regarding you addition to > >> the nifi group on GitHub. > >> > >> --aldrin > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hey folks, > >>> > >>> The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1]. I will keep this thread > updated > >>> as things progress and then generate a separate "helper" email for > >>> instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion. > >>> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419 > >>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard < > >>> pierre.villard...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow. > >>>> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin. > >>>> > >>>> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath < > lhorv...@hortonworks.com> > >>>> a > >>>> écrit : > >>>> > >>>> > +1 > >>>> > > >>>> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <moser...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > +1 from me, sounds great. > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda < > ab...@hortonworks.com > >>>> > > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ ) > >>>> > > > >>>> > > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <aldrinp...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Thanks to those of you that responded. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days > >>>> to see > >>>> > if > >>>> > > there > >>>> > > are any strong objections. Otherwise, I'll look to file > the > >>>> > ticket > >>>> > > around > >>>> > > midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end > of > >>>> > next week > >>>> > > to > >>>> > > hopefully minimize disruptions. Thanks again! > >>>> > > > >>>> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc < > trk...@gmail.com > >>>> > > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > +1, sounds like a great idea > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen < > >>>> > mikerthom...@gmail.com> > >>>> > > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > +1 > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna < > >>>> > > sivaprasanna...@gmail.com> > >>>> > > > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin. > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing < > >>>> > jvw...@gmail.com> > >>>> > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering. > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran < > >>>> > > kdoran.apa...@gmail.com> > >>>> > > > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > +1 > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" < > >>>> > alopre...@apache.org> > >>>> > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > +1. > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > Andy LoPresto > >>>> > > > > > > > alopre...@apache.org > >>>> > > > > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com > >>>> > > > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 > BACE > >>>> > 3C6E F65B > >>>> > > 2F7D > >>>> > > > > EF69 > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri < > >>>> > > aldrinp...@gmail.com> > >>>> > > > > > wrote: > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> Hey folks, > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list > about > >>>> the > >>>> > > deprecation > >>>> > > > of > >>>> > > > > > our > >>>> > > > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the > canonical > >>>> > repos that > >>>> > > > > > committers > >>>> > > > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to > >>>> GitHub) > >>>> > and > >>>> > > > > > transitioning > >>>> > > > > > > to > >>>> > > > > > > >> GitBox [2]. > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be > an > >>>> > optional > >>>> > > change, > >>>> > > > > > only > >>>> > > > > > > in > >>>> > > > > > > >> when and how it happens. There was a previous > >>>> > discussion > >>>> > > over > >>>> > > > this > >>>> > > > > > > topic > >>>> > > > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I > >>>> think > >>>> > some > >>>> > > of the > >>>> > > > > > > logistics > >>>> > > > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual > >>>> request to > >>>> > do so > >>>> > > was > >>>> > > > never > >>>> > > > > > > >> executed. > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early > >>>> > relocation. The > >>>> > > process > >>>> > > > > > > looks to > >>>> > > > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately > >>>> only > >>>> > result > >>>> > > in > >>>> > > > > > requiring > >>>> > > > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original > >>>> > git-wip based > >>>> > > > > remotes. > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the > >>>> > requisite > >>>> > > INFRA > >>>> > > > ticket > >>>> > > > > > and > >>>> > > > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to > the > >>>> > community > >>>> > > to make > >>>> > > > > > this > >>>> > > > > > > >> happen. Again, this is only about making the > >>>> choice > >>>> > to > >>>> > > perform > >>>> > > > this > >>>> > > > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu > >>>> of > >>>> > the mass > >>>> > > > > migration > >>>> > > > > > > that > >>>> > > > > > > >> would happen later. > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think > it > >>>> is a > >>>> > nice > >>>> > > bit of > >>>> > > > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our > >>>> open PRs > >>>> > and, > >>>> > > given > >>>> > > > my > >>>> > > > > > > prior > >>>> > > > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it > >>>> happen. > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> --aldrin > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> [1] > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E > >>>> > > > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/ > >>>> > > > > > > >> [3] > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>> >
