That level of interoperability is not there and, from some quick searching,
do not believe it to be something that is supported. [1]

Not sure what is meant by sign-off being automated.  Personally, I use the
-s flag when amending/pushing reviewed commits.

[1]
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 3:34 PM Peter Wicks (pwicks) <pwi...@micron.com>
wrote:

> Does closing a PR through GitHub close the JIRA ticket correctly? I'm
> assuming sign-off is automated this way, but wasn't sure about this step.
>
> Thanks,
>   Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aldrin Piri [mailto:aldrinp...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 6:23 AM
> To: dev <dev@nifi.apache.org>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox
>
> Some clarifying notes until I can get all the updates into place and
> generate a new email.
>
> There are now two locations that are writable by committers for each of
> our repositories.  The updated repository locations can be seen in the
> Apache NiFi section of https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf.  NiFi, for
> instance, is available at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi-site.git.  The web view of the
> repository is located at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi-site.git.  Please note the
> subtle distinction!
>
> If you are a contributor still on their way to committership or you are
> committer content with the same functionality we had with our old setup
> (git-wip), you will use the above listed locations.  You can update your
> location by performing the following steps:
>
>    - Go to the root of your source directory, we'll use nifi as an example
>       - cd ${repo_home}/nifi
>    - Update your remote.  On a default checkout this will be origin, but
>    use the name that is pointing to the old git-wip location (you can view
>    these using git remote -v)
>       - git remote set-url origin
>       https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git
>
>
> If you are a committer and interested in making use of the tighter GitHub
> integration, there are a few steps needed to enable this described at
> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/.  Please follow those and give some time
> to allow the background processes sync.  Successfully completing them
> should result in the email from GitHub on behalf of Gitbox I mentioned
> previously.
>
> Again, look for a bit more polished set of instructions in the next hour
> or so but feel free to add any questions here in the interim if it is
> holding you up.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:35 AM Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Just a quick note that migration has completed.  I'll be gathering up
> > information shortly and sending out another, separate email to the
> > community with any needed changes and will work to update our docs
> > appropriately.
> >
> > Committers, you should have received an email regarding you addition
> > to the nifi group on GitHub.
> >
> > --aldrin
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> The JIRA ticket has been submitted [1].  I will keep this thread
> >> updated as things progress and then generate a separate "helper"
> >> email for instructions/any updates that may be needed upon completion.
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17419
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:51 AM Pierre Villard <
> >> pierre.villard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 as well, should ease the contribution workflow.
> >>> Thanks for volunteering Aldrin.
> >>>
> >>> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 16:41, Laszlo Horvath
> >>> <lhorv...@hortonworks.com> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> > +1
> >>> >
> >>> > On 10/12/2018, 15:22, "Michael Moser" <moser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >     +1 from me, sounds great.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >     On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 AM Arpad Boda
> >>> > <ab...@hortonworks.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >     > +1 (for being the guinea pig __ )
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     > On 09/12/2018, 04:01, "Aldrin Piri" <aldrinp...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >     Thanks to those of you that responded.
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >     I think my tentative plan is to give this a few more days
> to
> >>> see
> >>> > if
> >>> >     > there
> >>> >     >     are any strong objections.  Otherwise, I'll look to file
> the
> >>> > ticket
> >>> >     > around
> >>> >     >     midweek and then look to begin the process toward the end
> of
> >>> > next week
> >>> >     > to
> >>> >     >     hopefully minimize disruptions.  Thanks again!
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >     On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tony Kurc <
> trk...@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >     > +1, sounds like a great idea
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >     > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen <
> >>> > mikerthom...@gmail.com>
> >>> >     >     > wrote:
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >     > > +1
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna <
> >>> >     > sivaprasanna...@gmail.com>
> >>> >     >     > > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     > > > +1 (non-binding)
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin.
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing <
> >>> > jvw...@gmail.com>
> >>> >     > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > +1, thanks for volunteering.
> >>> >     >     > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > > On Dec 7, 2018, at 13:39, Kevin Doran <
> >>> >     > kdoran.apa...@gmail.com>
> >>> >     >     > > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > > +1
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > > On 12/7/18, 15:17, "Andy LoPresto" <
> >>> > alopre...@apache.org>
> >>> >     > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    +1.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    Andy LoPresto
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    alopre...@apache.org
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    alopresto.apa...@gmail.com
> >>> >     >     > > > > >    PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4
> BACE
> >>> > 3C6E F65B
> >>> >     > 2F7D
> >>> >     >     > > EF69
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> On Dec 7, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Aldrin Piri <
> >>> >     > aldrinp...@gmail.com>
> >>> >     >     > > > wrote:
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> Hey folks,
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> Daniel Gruno sent an email to the dev list about
> >>> the
> >>> >     > deprecation
> >>> >     >     > of
> >>> >     >     > > > our
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> git-wip repositories [1] (these are the
> canonical
> >>> > repos that
> >>> >     >     > > > committers
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> push changes to and are currently mirrored to
> >>> GitHub)
> >>> > and
> >>> >     >     > > > transitioning
> >>> >     >     > > > > to
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> GitBox [2].
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> As highlighted in that email, this will not be
> an
> >>> > optional
> >>> >     > change,
> >>> >     >     > > > only
> >>> >     >     > > > > in
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> when and how it happens.  There was a previous
> >>> > discussion
> >>> >     > over
> >>> >     >     > this
> >>> >     >     > > > > topic
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> [3] where it was generally well received but I
> >>> think
> >>> > some
> >>> >     > of the
> >>> >     >     > > > > logistics
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> were never mapped out and thus the actual
> request
> >>> to
> >>> > do so
> >>> >     > was
> >>> >     >     > never
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> executed.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> I am proposing we volunteer for the early
> >>> > relocation.  The
> >>> >     > process
> >>> >     >     > > > > looks to
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> be fairly straightforward and should ultimately
> >>> only
> >>> > result
> >>> >     > in
> >>> >     >     > > > requiring
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> our contributors to add/replace their original
> >>> > git-wip based
> >>> >     >     > > remotes.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> If folks are in favor, I am happy to file the
> >>> > requisite
> >>> >     > INFRA
> >>> >     >     > ticket
> >>> >     >     > > > and
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> provide the associated communication/docs to the
> >>> > community
> >>> >     > to make
> >>> >     >     > > > this
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> happen.  Again, this is only about making the
> >>> choice
> >>> > to
> >>> >     > perform
> >>> >     >     > this
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> migration now, in a coordinated manner, in lieu
> of
> >>> > the mass
> >>> >     >     > > migration
> >>> >     >     > > > > that
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> would happen later.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> From a project management standpoint, I think it
> >>> is a
> >>> > nice
> >>> >     > bit of
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> functionality that lets us better curate our
> open
> >>> PRs
> >>> > and,
> >>> >     > given
> >>> >     >     > my
> >>> >     >     > > > > prior
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> interest in the subject, would like to see it
> >>> happen.
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> --aldrin
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> [1]
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8247bb17671d6131b1d7a646b4c018b
> >>> 21aac390c4f627d8fb1f421b2@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/
> >>> >     >     > > > > >> [3]
> >>> >     >     > > > > >>
> >>> >     >     > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >
> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de5e103994f356b1b8a572410938eef
> >>> 44af8cb352210e35305c04bc9@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > > >
> >>> >     >     > > >
> >>> >     >     > >
> >>> >     >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >     >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to