should I make a ticket for documenting maintaining the website? I couldn't find one.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt > > What can I do now to help with maintaining v2 stuff? Do I edit the > files in Git or the files in SVN? Don't want to mess with it yet > because I don't understand it. But if you can give me a few pointers > I can help. > > Thanks > Joe > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Matt Gilman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I have an idea of how its going to work. However, once we reach out to > > infrastructure regarding the external build (if necessary) we'll know for > > sure [1]. After that discussion I will update nifi-site in our Git repo > > accordingly. It says that the mailing list is infrastructure@, does that > > mean [email protected]? > > > > Mark had an idea about an updated screenshot but higher priority things > > have popped up. The image can be updated whenever its ready [2]. > > > > If you have any other ideas for media we should incorporate (other > > screenshots, FAQs, videos, etc) let me know. > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#external > > [2] > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nifi/blob/develop/nifi-site/src/images/flow.png > > > > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Matt > >> > >> It looks good. Before we switch we should get the mechanics of update > >> documented. Do you know that or is it TBD? > >> > >> Also do you need assistance with updating the screenshot? > >> > >> Joe > >> On Feb 8, 2015 4:45 AM, "Matt Gilman" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Barring any objections, I'd like to more forward with the updated > website > >> > [1]. I've kept up with the changes with the exception of those from > the > >> > last few days. Assuming everyone is on board I will reach out to INFRA > >> > about the possibilities for the website build. Based on that > >> conservation I > >> > will update the nifi-site in our Git repo [2] accordingly. I am > assuming > >> > that we'll be doing an external build and part of that build will be > >> > deploying the site using SVN. > >> > > >> > [1] https://nifi.incubator.apache.org/v2/ > >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-nifi/tree/develop/nifi-site > >> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Jennifer Barnabee < > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > I think that's perfect! > >> > > > >> > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hello > >> > > > > >> > > > Made some of these suggested edits/simplifications to the current > >> site. > >> > > > New tagline > >> > > > > >> > > > "Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to > >> > process > >> > > > and distribute data." > >> > > > > >> > > > Also removed the jumbotron block as it was causing some really > >> strange > >> > > text > >> > > > sizing issues. > >> > > > > >> > > > Jenn - does this seem more like what you were thinking? > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks > >> > > > Joe > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Matt Gilman < > >> [email protected] > >> > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Aldrin, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > What you've outline is exactly what I am looking to accomplish, > I'm > >> > > just > >> > > > > trying to figure out all the pieces. I think I have a handle on > >> > > > everything > >> > > > > except actual publishing of the site. Though I believe the email > >> you > >> > > sent > >> > > > > out earlier indicates that we just need to discuss the matter > >> further > >> > > > with > >> > > > > infrastructure@ mailing list. I tried committing a change > (outside > >> > of > >> > > > CMS) > >> > > > > to the staging repository hoping it would kick off the > publishing. > >> It > >> > > did > >> > > > > not. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I have prototyped the site artifacts which can be built into the > >> > static > >> > > > > site. I still need to copy over the existing content but I'm > trying > >> > to > >> > > > > figure out where this is going to live first. Barring any > >> objections > >> > I > >> > > am > >> > > > > going to create (likely tomorrow) a nifi-site directory at the > root > >> > of > >> > > > our > >> > > > > Git repository and go from there. Currently everything is living > >> in a > >> > > > > repository that I forked from the work that Aldrin had started. > >> > > Anyways, > >> > > > I > >> > > > > believe moving it to the project Git repository puts the site > in a > >> > more > >> > > > > accessible place where others can contribute as necessary. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > As I mentioned to Dan earlier, I am hoping that we can utilize a > >> > maven > >> > > > > plugin [1] to deploy the relevant documentation (processor, > guides, > >> > > > > javadocs) from the application build to a predefined location. > The > >> > site > >> > > > > would just reference it from there. This would keep the site and > >> > > > > application builds independent which I think is desirable. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/ > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Aldrin Piri < > >> [email protected]> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > All the comments have been good but are a bit beyond where the > >> > > current > >> > > > > > platform for them needs to be. Additionally, with a site more > >> > > > accessible > >> > > > > > and live, changes can be made via contributions. Trying to > route > >> > > things > >> > > > > > back on topic a bit as there are external dependencies on some > >> > > > > "finalized" > >> > > > > > state of the site, I did some research into how other projects > >> are > >> > > > > > accomplishing this based off of Matt's notes. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Matt, looking at jclouds, it appears as though they also use > the > >> > ASF > >> > > > > > infrastructure to manage their site, but perform a build > through > >> a > >> > > > script > >> > > > > > [1], invoking Jekyll to generate the static pages pushed to > the > >> > infra > >> > > > > SVN; > >> > > > > > it is a home-brewed git+svn of sorts, but the overall concept > >> makes > >> > > > > sense. > >> > > > > > Given the technologies you listed, this seems like a fair > >> approach > >> > to > >> > > > > > utilize the build tools right for the job while simultaneously > >> not > >> > > > > > requiring a special setup as outlined in the Apache CMS > >> information > >> > > > [2], > >> > > > > > the community can freely pick the technologies they wish with > the > >> > > > notion > >> > > > > > that the interface between site code and the actual view is > >> static > >> > > html > >> > > > > > committed to the Infra SVN repo. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The one area that I think is important to address though is > the > >> > > > > > incorporation of the material being generated in the git > >> repository > >> > > and > >> > > > > as > >> > > > > > a product of the build process. Quickly brainstorming a way > to > >> > > attack > >> > > > > this > >> > > > > > would be: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > 1. provide a top level folder in the NiFi git repository, > 'site' > >> > > > (Matt > >> > > > > > posed this as a possibility to which no one had any > objections, > >> so > >> > it > >> > > > > seems > >> > > > > > like a reasonable path forward) > >> > > > > > 2. provide a script that compiles the site, making use of the > >> > > desired > >> > > > > > tools assuming the structure of the site > >> > > > > > 3. provide orchestration of the core codebase and the site > >> > > > > > a. through Maven and possibly the exec or similar plugin, > >> > profile, > >> > > > or > >> > > > > > other avenue, build the codebase needed (mvn -pl -am may do > the > >> > job) > >> > > > > > b. call the script to generate the static structure of the > >> site > >> > > > which > >> > > > > > has a build target that is a copy of the svn checkout to make > use > >> > of > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > diff (maybe there is a way to use git+svn to make this work > in a > >> > less > >> > > > > > cumbersome manner) > >> > > > > > 4. commit to infra subversion > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The code for the site is easily accessible and allows > submission > >> of > >> > > > > patches > >> > > > > > via git while using the tools that make sense for > accomplishing > >> > what > >> > > is > >> > > > > > needed; Subversion just becomes the means for content > delivery. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > There are certainly a number of details to iron out with the > >> above > >> > > > plan. > >> > > > > > The biggest item is taking the disparate formats (asciidoc, > >> > processor > >> > > > > > documentation) and condensing them into the HTML/CSS template > set > >> > > > forth, > >> > > > > > but both have provisions for specifying CSS, so it is > certainly > >> > > doable. > >> > > > > > The above method allows for the avoidance of committing > generated > >> > > files > >> > > > > to > >> > > > > > the core codebase (obviously, all generated files compose the > SVN > >> > > > site), > >> > > > > > and allows for a direct correlation between documentation and > a > >> > given > >> > > > > > commit while simultaneously not binding the site explicitly to > >> SVN > >> > or > >> > > > ASF > >> > > > > > CMS. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > One item that seems problematic with the above plan is that it > >> > would > >> > > > > remove > >> > > > > > the ease of submitting a patch via the provided bookmarklet > that > >> > > works > >> > > > > with > >> > > > > > the CMS. This becomes a manual process to find the source > >> content > >> > > and > >> > > > > > apply the patch to it in Git. Although to some extent, this > is > >> > > already > >> > > > > the > >> > > > > > case given the use of Asciidoc and the Processor > documentation. > >> > Not > >> > > > sure > >> > > > > > if it is a deal breaker or not, but it is a point of > >> consideration. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > [1] > >> > > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/blob/master/deploy-site.sh > >> > > > > > [2] http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#external > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Jennifer Barnabee < > >> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > You guys are totally right. Ok, as a starting point, what > >> about > >> > > this > >> > > > > or > >> > > > > > > something like this? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Apache NiFi is a highly configurable and intuitive dataflow > >> > > > management > >> > > > > > > system. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -Jenn > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Donald Miner < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Same here, never heard of fbp. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I like the Accumulo blurb on the front page a lot: > >> > > > > > > > The Apache Accumulo™ sorted, distributed key/value store > is a > >> > > > robust, > >> > > > > > > > scalable, high performance data storage and retrieval > system. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > (I think i based my suggestion on this). It just gets to > the > >> > > point > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > > as > >> > > > > > > > a technologist that has a clue or two I know what it is > >> trying > >> > to > >> > > > do. > >> > > > > > > > Another example Kafka: "A high-throughput distributed > >> messaging > >> > > > > > system. " > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Jan 29, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Joey Echeverria < > >> > [email protected] > >> > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Just to clarify, I wasn't advocating that it should be > >> > removed > >> > > > (I'm > >> > > > > > not > >> > > > > > > > > really advocating for anything). My point was meant to > >> > > illustrate > >> > > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > it's > >> > > > > > > > > not a draw, but it is potentially an educational > reference. > >> > So, > >> > > > it > >> > > > > > > > depends > >> > > > > > > > > on how you want to use the real-estate in the tag line. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 11:19:38 AM Joe Witt < > >> > [email protected] > >> > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> We can get rid of the FBP reference. I'll just be the > >> > excited > >> > > > > tech > >> > > > > > > guy > >> > > > > > > > in > >> > > > > > > > >> the corner of the conference that keeps talking about > it. > >> > > > > > > > >>>> On Jan 29, 2015 1:00 PM, "Joey Echeverria" < > >> > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>> I understand that flow-based programming is very > >> important > >> > as > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > > model > >> > > > > > > > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >>> NiFi, but I don't think it's a widely understood term. > >> > FWIW, > >> > > I > >> > > > > > hadn't > >> > > > > > > > >> heard > >> > > > > > > > >>> of it until I started working with NiFi. > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>> On Thu Jan 29 2015 at 9:56:10 AM Jennifer Barnabee < > >> > > > > > > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>> Hi Donald, > >> > > > > > > > >>>> I like your tagline sentence for the most part. > Thanks > >> so > >> > > much > >> > > > > for > >> > > > > > > > >>> sending > >> > > > > > > > >>>> it. Maybe it can get us to where we want to be... > >> > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>> I have these thoughts to add... > >> > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>> a) I think we want to honor that flow-based > programming > >> is > >> > > the > >> > > > > > basis > >> > > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > >>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>> software. So, that's important, and I think that's > why > >> it > >> > > went > >> > > > > > into > >> > > > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > >>>> tagline. But I'm not sure whether it has to be > >> > specifically > >> > > > > there. > >> > > > > > > > >>> Someone > >> > > > > > > > >>>> else can weigh in on that. > >> > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>> b) My only problem with your tagline is the last > part: > >> > > > > "transform > >> > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > >>> move > >> > > > > > > > >>>> files". One thing is - we don't want to limit NiFi to > >> > being > >> > > > only > >> > > > > > > > >>>> file-based. Secondly, moving and transforming data is > >> not > >> > > all > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > NiFi > >> > > > > > > > >>>> does. In truth, NiFi is not just a dataflow system. > >> It's a > >> > > > > > dataflow > >> > > > > > > > >>>> management system. And that encompasses everything > about > >> > the > >> > > > > > > dataflow, > >> > > > > > > > >>> from > >> > > > > > > > >>>> how the data moves and/or gets transformed and > routed, > >> to > >> > > how > >> > > > > you > >> > > > > > > > >> monitor > >> > > > > > > > >>>> that, how you track down the data, how you configure > and > >> > > > design > >> > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > >>>> dataflow to be better, etc. The moving and > transforming > >> > > parts > >> > > > > are > >> > > > > > > > just > >> > > > > > > > >>>> some of the extension points. It's the framework that > >> > allows > >> > > > you > >> > > > > > to > >> > > > > > > > >>> manage > >> > > > > > > > >>>> *whatever* you do with the data. > >> > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>> So, now that I've rambled on, it's clear that I can't > >> come > >> > > up > >> > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > >>>> something concise. I think I may be too close to > >> > everything > >> > > > :-) > >> > > > > > > > >>>> But I think you are on the right track! I would be > happy > >> > to > >> > > > know > >> > > > > > > what > >> > > > > > > > >>>> others think. It would be great if people could land > on > >> > the > >> > > > page > >> > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > >>>> quickly understand what NiFi is. So far, your > sentence > >> > would > >> > > > get > >> > > > > > > > people > >> > > > > > > > >>>> closer to that than anything I have proposed. > >> > > > > > > > >>>> Cheers, > >> > > > > > > > >>>> Jenn > >> > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Donald Miner < > >> > > > > > > [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> On the subject of taglines, a minor nitpick (sorry). > >> I'm > >> > > > just a > >> > > > > > fan > >> > > > > > > > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> concise and meaningful taglines. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> "is a dataflow system based on the concepts of > >> flow-based > >> > > > > > > > >> programming. > >> > > > > > > > >>> It > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> is currently a part of the Apache Incubator." is > rather > >> > > > wordy. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> "flow" and "based" are in this sentence twice, which > >> > makes > >> > > it > >> > > > > > kind > >> > > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> awkward. Does flow-based programming really matter > >> enough > >> > > to > >> > > > be > >> > > > > > > part > >> > > > > > > > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> tagline? Maybe it should just be a bullet point > below. > >> > Same > >> > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > >>>> incubator > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> status... I think that's readily available > information > >> > that > >> > > > > > doesn't > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> necessarily need to be in the tagline (and would > >> > eventually > >> > > > > > > change). > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> Here's my stab: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> "The Apache NiFi dataflow system is an easy to use, > >> > highly > >> > > > > > > > >>> configurable, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> extendable, and reliable way to transform and move > >> > files." > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> I think the list of properties in the middle of my > >> > sentence > >> > > > > could > >> > > > > > > be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> replaced by someone who has a better idea of what > the > >> > true > >> > > > > > sticking > >> > > > > > > > >>>> points > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> for NiFi will be. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> -d > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Joe Witt < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Jenn > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Apologies for the delayed feedback. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I agree it could be more concise but feel like the > >> > > proposed > >> > > > is > >> > > > > > too > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> concise > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> to as have lost some important meaning. Many > projects > >> > > claim > >> > > > > > > > >> they're > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> lightweight, scalable, and easy to use and almost > >> always > >> > > > that > >> > > > > > just > >> > > > > > > > >>>> isn't > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> true. We're arguably not 'lightweight' anymore. > We > >> > could > >> > > > > have > >> > > > > > > > >> said > >> > > > > > > > >>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> when it was a 6 MB download perhaps but now that > we're > >> > > > > weighing > >> > > > > > in > >> > > > > > > > >> at > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> 100MB's we probably shouldn't claim that on its > own. > >> > > We're > >> > > > > > > > >> certainly > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> 'lightweight' in many important aspects and > arguably > >> in > >> > > all > >> > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > >> ways > >> > > > > > > > >>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> truly matter but we should be at least somewhat > >> > > specific. I > >> > > > > > agree > >> > > > > > > > >>>> we're > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> scalable but again without context that feels > >> > > misleading. I > >> > > > > > agree > >> > > > > > > > >> we > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> have > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> an extremely nice UI that is indeed highly > >> configurable > >> > > and > >> > > > > > > > >> intuitive > >> > > > > > > > >>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the same thoughts apply which is we should provide > >> some > >> > > > > context > >> > > > > > as > >> > > > > > > > >> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> what > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> we mean. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> This is the nice part of this as an open source > thing. > >> > We > >> > > > can > >> > > > > > > just > >> > > > > > > > >>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> straight up and precise about the features and what > >> > > they're > >> > > > > good > >> > > > > > > > >> for > >> > > > > > > > >>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> what they do. We can even be self deprecating and > >> point > >> > > out > >> > > > > > what > >> > > > > > > > >>> we're > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> not > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> good at. If it were a commercial construct or we > were > >> > > > > marketing > >> > > > > > > > >> then > >> > > > > > > > >>>> we > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> might need to be less specific so as not to exclude > >> some > >> > > > > > potential > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> business > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> area. But in this case, we're a tiny little open > >> source > >> > > > > project > >> > > > > > > > >> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> very > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> few people know about. We're only going to grow by > >> > being > >> > > > > > > > >>>> straightforward > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> about what it is and attracting those who buy in to > >> that > >> > > > > vision > >> > > > > > > and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> direction. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Just thoughts here - i am not asking you to avoid > >> > changing > >> > > > it > >> > > > > > > > >> should > >> > > > > > > > >>>> you > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> feel really strongly that you want to change it. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Joe > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Jennifer Barnabee > < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi Matt et al - > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> The new website design is looking great... I feel > >> like > >> > > the > >> > > > > > text > >> > > > > > > > >>>> needs > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> be simpler and more to the point. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> For the tagline under the first Apache nifi > heading, > >> I > >> > > > > suggest > >> > > > > > > > >>> making > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> bullet rather than including the verb "is". I'd > also > >> > like > >> > > > to > >> > > > > > make > >> > > > > > > > >>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> features into simpler bullets. See my suggested > text > >> > > > below. I > >> > > > > > > > >> hope > >> > > > > > > > >>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> still > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> captures the essence of what we want to convey, > but > >> > > others > >> > > > > may > >> > > > > > > > >> have > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> good > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> suggestions as well... For example, in the last > >> > bullet, > >> > > I > >> > > > > > don't > >> > > > > > > > >>> know > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> if > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> "client" would be better than "user" or if > >> > > "authentication" > >> > > > > > would > >> > > > > > > > >>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> better > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> than "authorization". You guys probably have a > better > >> > > > handle > >> > > > > on > >> > > > > > > > >>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> type > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> of stuff. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *Apache nifi * > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - A dataflow system based on the concepts of > >> flow-based > >> > > > > > > > >>> programming. > >> > > > > > > > >>>> It > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> currently a part of the Apache Incubator. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Apache NiFi supports powerful and scalable > directed > >> > > graphs > >> > > > of > >> > > > > > > > >> data > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> routing, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> transformation, and system mediation logic. > >> High-level > >> > > > > features > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> include: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Lightweight > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Scalable > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Highly Configurable > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Intuitive User Interface > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Component-based Extension Model > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Fine Grained Data Provenance > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Enterprise & Inter-system Security > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Content Encryption/Decryption > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - Pluggable SSL & PKI User Authorization > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> *I kinda don't like that you have to scroll down > to > >> see > >> > > all > >> > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> features. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> But I realize it wouldn't bother me if I was > looking > >> at > >> > > it > >> > > > on > >> > > > > > my > >> > > > > > > > >>>> phone, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> so > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I don't know why I'm complaining about that... * > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Cheers, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jenn > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Matt Gilman < > >> > > > > > > > >>>> [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I went ahead and started implementing the website > >> > based > >> > > on > >> > > > > the > >> > > > > > > > >>> most > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> recent > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> feedback and mock ups. I've done just the main > page > >> > and > >> > > > put > >> > > > > it > >> > > > > > > > >>>> here: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> http://nifi.incubator.apache.org/v2/ > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Please let me know if there's a more appropriate > >> place > >> > > to > >> > > > > host > >> > > > > > > > >>>> that. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Anyways, I am going to continue working to port > over > >> > the > >> > > > > > > > >>> remaining > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> pages > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and figure out a good way to integrate the > >> > documentation > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > >> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> generated > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> from building NiFi. Part of that is likely going > to > >> > > depend > >> > > > > on > >> > > > > > > > >>> what > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> repository the site is kept in. What I've done > uses > >> a > >> > > > number > >> > > > > > of > >> > > > > > > > >>>> tools > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> (grunt, assemble, bower, etc) to actually build > the > >> > > site. > >> > > > I > >> > > > > > > > >>> believe > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Apache CMS tool will be CMing the resulting site. > >> > Where > >> > > do > >> > > > > > > > >> others > >> > > > > > > > >>>> CM > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> actual development artifacts of their sites? I > did > >> > find > >> > > > > > another > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> Apache > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> project with a similar set up: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and they appear to have a separate repository for > >> > there > >> > > > > site. > >> > > > > > > > >>>> Should > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> requesting another repository for this? Or > should I > >> > just > >> > > > add > >> > > > > > it > >> > > > > > > > >>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> existing incubator-nifi and have a top level > folder > >> > for > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > > > >> site? > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Also, I also noticed that jclouds has a > deployment > >> > > script > >> > > > > > which > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> appears > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> automate that process as well. Is this how most > >> > projects > >> > > > > > handle > >> > > > > > > > >>>> site > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> updates? > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Matt > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Aldrin Piri < > >> > > > > > > > >>> [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Seems like a fair list of points to resolve. > Let > >> me > >> > > know > >> > > > > how > >> > > > > > > > >>> you > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> want > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> to tackle it and if you'd like me to investigate > >> any > >> > of > >> > > > > them. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> AsciiDoc provides an HTML5 backend [1] that > should > >> > > > provide > >> > > > > a > >> > > > > > > > >>> hook > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> help it be consistent in some form with the > rest of > >> > the > >> > > > > site. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [1] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/asciidoc.css-embedded.html#X35 > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Matt Gilman < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Agreed. Lets see give it a try and see how it > >> > looks. I > >> > > > > > > > >>> thought > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> about > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> possibly just putting the drop in the toolbar > but > >> > held > >> > > > off > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> initially > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your comment about being consistently visible > >> across > >> > > all > >> > > > > > > > >>> pages > >> > > > > > > > >>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> on > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> point. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> This brings up another issue that the current > >> > > > > documentation > >> > > > > > > > >>>> loads > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> page > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> without the toolbar so that'll have to be > >> addressed. > >> > > > > > > > >> Haven't > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> messed > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> bootstrap so I'll have to see what's possible. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Outstanding issues... > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> - Better integrate documentation pages into > >> website > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> - Get updated images (and properly scale them) > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> - Update website markup for production use > (what I > >> > did > >> > > > was > >> > > > > > > > >>>> quick > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> just > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> for the mockup so we continue this discussion) > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Anything else I'm forgetting? > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Aldrin Piri < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Matt, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Looks good here. I think clean and simple is > the > >> > > right > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> direction > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is just another step in that evolution. I > think > >> it > >> > > is a > >> > > > > > > > >>> matter > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> nit-picking at this point so the following > >> comments > >> > > > come > >> > > > > > > > >>> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> scope of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> importance. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I would like to see the logo make it > somewhere on > >> > the > >> > > > > page > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> consistently > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> for > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the sake of keeping it across all pages in the > >> > > site. I > >> > > > > > > > >>>> realize > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> logo in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the navbar is rather redundant for the home > page, > >> > but > >> > > > on > >> > > > > > > > >> all > >> > > > > > > > >>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> other > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> pages such as documentation and general > project > >> > > > > > > > >> information, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> there > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> will > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> no presence in the current state. One way to > >> > > > compromise > >> > > > > > > > >>> might > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> make > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> use of the commonplace technique where the > logo > >> on > >> > > the > >> > > > > > > > >> main > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> content > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> area > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> gets placed into the navbar when scrolling > would > >> > > > obscure > >> > > > > > > > >> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> logo; > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> all > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> other pages would then just have it in the > >> header. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe a slightly heavier weight on the navbar > for > >> > the > >> > > > > menu > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> items. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 22:51 Matt Gilman < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Aldrin, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I like what you did here and it sounds like > most > >> > > > people > >> > > > > > > > >> do > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> too. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wanted > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> provide some feedback and minor suggestions > but > >> > > > thought > >> > > > > > > > >> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> would > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> just > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> easier to mock it up myself rather than > trying > >> to > >> > > ask > >> > > > > > > > >> you > >> > > > > > > > >>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> move > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> here > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and that there. Anyways, take a peek and lets > >> > > continue > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> iterating. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> think > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> we're on the right track. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://raw.githubusercontent. > >> > > > > > > > >>>> com/mcgilman/apache-nifi-site/ > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> screenshots/index.html.lite.v1.2.png > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Matt > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Joe Witt < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> No real thought behind it. But I personally > >> > agree > >> > > > > > > > >> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>> your > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> statement: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the logos look good as "nifi" and the text > >> looks > >> > > good > >> > > > > > > > >> as > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> "NiFi" > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Daniel > Bress > >> < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aldrin, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this looks good. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is a little off topic, but I > >> > noticed > >> > > > > > > > >>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> logos > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistently use "nifi" whereas in text its > >> > > > > > > > >>> consistently > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> written > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> as > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "NiFi". Any reason for the difference? > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I kind of thing the logos look good as > >> "nifi" > >> > > and > >> > > > > > > > >>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> text > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> looks > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> good > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as "NiFi" so I might be questioning > something > >> > > that I > >> > > > > > > > >>> am > >> > > > > > > > >>>> OK > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> with. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> But I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> noticed they are different and was > wondering > >> if > >> > > this > >> > > > > > > > >>>> was a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> conscious > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision or not. Thoughts? > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan Bress > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ONYX Consulting Services > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________ > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Joe Witt <[email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 6:40 PM > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Website Theme > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Solid design and agree with all your > comments > >> > > > > > > > >> aldrin. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> Very > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> nice > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2015 6:27 PM, "Aldrin Piri" < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the comments. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I actuality tried it without the logo on > the > >> > main > >> > > > > > > > >>> page > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> felt > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit empty. I don't know that we > necessarily > >> > need > >> > > > > > > > >>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> logo > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> there, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something is needed. Additionally, I > viewed > >> it > >> > > as > >> > > > > > > > >>>> being > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> just > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "front > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page" inclusion, as other pages would just > >> have > >> > > > > > > > >> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>> top > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> navbar. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You caught me. I was lazy and I recycled > the > >> > > > > > > > >>>> screenshot > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> from > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first iteration. It would definitely need > >> > > > > > > > >> updating, > >> > > > > > > > >>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> largely > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a placeholder for the concept. I > would > >> > > > > > > > >>>> definitely > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> like > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> something > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit more engaging. (faux edit) I > >> rearranged > >> > > > > > > > >>> things > >> > > > > > > > >>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> bit, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> removing > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the second instance of the logo and > placing > >> > more > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> emphasis > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> on > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> one > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the corner of the application. Not > sure > >> if > >> > I > >> > > > > > > > >>> like > >> > > > > > > > >>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> better, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've provided the results [1] with all > three > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> submissions > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> shown > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in chronological order [2]. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The news section is a toss-up for me at > this > >> > > > > > > > >>> juncture. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> could > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> see > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the need one for eventually, but I'm not > sure > >> > if > >> > > > > > > > >> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> project > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> quite > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there yet. It seemed a common thread > among > >> > > > > > > > >>> incubating > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> sites > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> such > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a section was omitted whereas those > top-level > >> > > > > > > > >>> projects > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> typically > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included one. Given that the project is > on > >> the > >> > > > > > > > >>> verge > >> > > > > > > > >>>> on > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> first > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the regular releases, perhaps this is > >> > > increasingly > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> pertinent > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near future. At minimum, one of the > screen > >> > grabs > >> > > > > > > > >>> from > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> your > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> blog > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> posts > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be a good candidate. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/scr > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> eenshots/index.html.lite.v1.1.png > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/blob/screenshots/README.md > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Mark > Payne > >> < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aldrin, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm liking it! Definitely looks nice. > >> Though I > >> > > > > > > > >>> would > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> provide a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> bit > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure that I would include the > NiFi > >> > logo > >> > > > > > > > >> on > >> > > > > > > > >>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> right-hand > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> side, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since it's already in the top-left. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From a NiFi 'brand' perspective, I would > >> > update > >> > > > > > > > >>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> screenshot a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> bit. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This screenshot is using the old logo in > the > >> > > > > > > > >>> top-left > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> corner, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> graph > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shows all of the data disappearing before > the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> RouteOnAttribute > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Processor. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd recommend we construct a dataflow > that's > >> > more > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> appealing > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> target > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audience, perhaps integrating with other > >> Apache > >> > > > > > > > >>>> projects > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> (HDFS, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Kafka > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible, for instance) or using (S)FTP > >> > > processor. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does it make sense to have maybe like a > >> > 'Latest > >> > > > > > > > >>>> News' > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> section > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> or > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something where we could post things like > >> > > "Version > >> > > > > > > > >>>> 0.0.1 > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> just > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> released!" > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.? > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm really liking the concept - nice job! > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks-Mark > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:00:52 -0800 > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Website Theme > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like it. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Aldrin > >> Piri > >> > < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found some time today to provide > another > >> > > > > > > > >> look > >> > > > > > > > >>>> for > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> site. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> There > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were very minor changes to the core > HTML > >> as > >> > > > > > > > >> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> currently > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> served > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nidi homepage and it is largely just a > >> > > > > > > > >>>> stylesheet. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> This > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> one > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimal and clean, still driven by > >> Bootstrap > >> > > > > > > > >>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> directly > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> makes > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> use > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the colors from the UI itself. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A screenshot can be seen at > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/scr > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> eenshots/index.html.lite.png > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the associated code under the > "lite" > >> > > > > > > > >>> branch > >> > > > > > > > >>>> at > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> https://github.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site/tree/lite > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts are appreciated. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Aldrin > >> Piri > >> > < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry if this somehow gets sent twice. > >> My > >> > > > > > > > >>>> first > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> submission > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seemed > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bounce as it exceeded the spam > threshold > >> > > > > > > > >>> when I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> sent > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> it a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> couple > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours ago and it has yet to appear, so > >> I'm > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> sending > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> again. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> First and foremost, good feedback. I > >> think > >> > > > > > > > >>>> UI/UX > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> stuff > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tricky > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am happy to find my livelihood in > the > >> > > > > > > > >>>> plumbing > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> behind > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scenes > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's my attempt to try and tackle > all > >> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> comments > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> one > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> fell > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swoop: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that Bootstrap is everywhere, > >> but I > >> > > > > > > > >>>> don't > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> necessarily > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> think > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is a bad thing. One could argue > >> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> interfaces > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> all > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> forms > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> converging and users have the instant > >> > > > > > > > >>>> familiarity > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> known > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quantity. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that I am totally unaware of > what > >> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>> takes > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> make a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> site > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functional and maintain its feel > across > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> devices. I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> think > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> last > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part is important. Personally, as a > user > >> > > > > > > > >> on > >> > > > > > > > >>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> other > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> side > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> screen, I don't really understand why > >> sites > >> > > > > > > > >>> do > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> not > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> work > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> or > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> jive > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my mobile device du jour these days; > it > >> > > > > > > > >>> should > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> just > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> work. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> With > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little I've learned about UX and "Not > >> > > > > > > > >> Making > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [Anyone] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Think,"[1] I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want an effortless experience; no > pinch > >> > > > > > > > >>>> zooming, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> tap > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> panning, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a way to take bits and > pieces of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> bootstrap > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> end > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support that aspect without the cookie > >> > > > > > > > >> cutter > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> air, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> would > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thankful for some guidance on that > front > >> > > > > > > > >> and > >> > > > > > > > >>> do > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> my > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> best > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> provide > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Out of the box though, the sample > looked > >> > > > > > > > >>> pretty > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> decent > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> across > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> all > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices to which I had access, and > used > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> constructs > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> everyone > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> who > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> views > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content through a tiny screen is > >> > > > > > > > >> accustomed. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do agree on the front of the > >> possibility > >> > > > > > > > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> brand > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> dilution, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it is an excellent point for > >> > > > > > > > >>>> consideration. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> As > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original mailing, consideration was > given > >> > > > > > > > >> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> integrating > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application's aesthetics into the core > >> > > > > > > > >> site. > >> > > > > > > > >>>> Not > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> sure > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> if > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pan out in an appreciable way as I can > >> see > >> > > > > > > > >> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> my > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> mind, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> do > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel it is an avenue worth > exploring. It > >> > > > > > > > >> may > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> also > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> completely > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> miss > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mark, but with my new found web dev > >> > > > > > > > >> prowess, > >> > > > > > > > >>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> should > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> be a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> much > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quicker iteration than the first > draft. > >> > > > > > > > >>> You'll > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> see a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> slight > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> homage > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this via the graph wallpaper that is > >> > > > > > > > >> featured > >> > > > > > > > >>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> application > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself. This was muted a bit by a CSS > >> > > > > > > > >>> overlay > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> to a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> level > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seemed > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> okay, but I definitely hedged as to > >> whether > >> > > > > > > > >>> or > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> not > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> include > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, I wanted to get something > out > >> > > > > > > > >> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> start > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ball > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rolling, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> establishing a base for successive > >> > > > > > > > >>>> iterations. I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> know > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the hard work everyone is putting in, > the > >> > > > > > > > >>>> project > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> closely > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reaching > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its first milestone for release, and > >> > > > > > > > >> thought > >> > > > > > > > >>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> important to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> chip > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where possible to give a face to the > >> > > > > > > > >> project. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Additionally, I think this particular > >> > > > > > > > >> project > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> needs > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> pictures > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate what it's capabilities. > One > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> facets > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> makes > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believer about NiFi as a whole is that > >> the > >> > > > > > > > >>> end > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> user > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> not > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> just > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers. Citing the previous > example > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Accumulo, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> its > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> intended > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> audience is very technical in nature > and, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> accordingly, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> lot > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> can > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed via the simple phrase of > >> > > > > > > > >> "key-value > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> store." > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> would > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contend > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that NiFi's reach is far broader and > >> can't > >> > > > > > > > >> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> done > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> justice > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple phrase. For the casual > potential > >> > > > > > > > >> user > >> > > > > > > > >>>> who > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> has > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> strung > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> n-many processes of taking a file, > >> manually > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> transforming > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> it, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moving it elsewhere, they need to see > at > >> > > > > > > > >>> quick > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> glance > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> there > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something that can automate this > tedium > >> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>> make > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> them > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> more > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effective. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Succinctly, the value proposition > needs > >> to > >> > > > > > > > >> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> there > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> not > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> only > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical folks who will use this as a > >> > > > > > > > >>>> framework, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> additionally > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end users. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The background for the header isn't > >> > > > > > > > >> awesome, > >> > > > > > > > >>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> knew I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating any licenses if I generated > it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> myself. I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> viewed > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> more > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a placeholder than anything else. > >> > > > > > > > >> Definitely > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> not a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> front > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> end > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> web > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developer, even more definitively not > a > >> > > > > > > > >>> graphic > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> artist. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> The > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> colors > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> came from starting with the logo dark > >> blue > >> > > > > > > > >>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> running > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> whole > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bunch > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of filters and plugins via GIMP to get > >> > > > > > > > >>>> something. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Additionally, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a CSS gradient applied over top of > it > >> as > >> > > > > > > > >>>> well > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> when > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> seemed > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too loud. It could definitely deal > with > >> > > > > > > > >>> being > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> muted > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> bit > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> more. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.sensible.com/dmmt.html > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Tony > >> Kurc > >> > > > > > > > >> < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey! It looks awesome! The existing > site > >> > > > > > > > >> was > >> > > > > > > > >>>> put > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> together a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> placeholder > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we went with a very generic layout > that > >> > > > > > > > >>> worked > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> well > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CMS and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contained all the information > expected > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >> an > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> apache > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> process. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a big improvement! For people > >> new > >> > > > > > > > >> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> project, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gives > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upfront screenshot, with big fat > links > >> for > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> things > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> care > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> about > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seeing! > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some things I didn't like about the > >> > > > > > > > >> existing > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> site > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> are > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> glyphicon > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> links > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to "external" sites on the menu. I > used > >> > > > > > > > >>>> "link", > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> think > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meant to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be used for "permalink". Also, we > kind > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>> took a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> best > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> guess > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> about > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should go in each dropdown in the > menu. > >> > > > > > > > >> I'm > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> pretty > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> sure > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> could > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organized. I'd also like to see the > >> > > > > > > > >> awesome > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> guides > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> people > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent theme with the website and > >> > > > > > > > >> maybe > >> > > > > > > > >>>> have > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> pdfs > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> so > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> old-school > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folks > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can print them out (which may be a > dumb > >> > > > > > > > >> idea > >> > > > > > > > >>>> ;) > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> ) > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> A > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pet > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> peeve > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mine of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects is having a hard time > finding > >> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> documentation I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> need, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> javadocs or specifications - and > keeping > >> > > > > > > > >>>> around > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> older > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation. I think we're still > >> working > >> > > > > > > > >>> on > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> these > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> - > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> since > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> you > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> retained > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the menu up top it should be > >> > > > > > > > >> straightforward > >> > > > > > > > >>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> have a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> robust > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropdown. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The blue you used is more of a > reddish > >> or > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> purplish > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> blue > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the app is more of a greenish blue. > I'm > >> > > > > > > > >> kind > >> > > > > > > > >>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> curious > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> what > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> greener > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would look like ... did you mock one > up > >> > > > > > > > >> and > >> > > > > > > > >>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> looked > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> bad? > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Or > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fundamental question, should the > website > >> > > > > > > > >>> evoke > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> theme of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> app? I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't know how I feel. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tony > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Joe > >> Witt > >> > > > > > > > >> < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd say the two sides of the > spectrum > >> as > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> examples > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> are: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://kafka.apache.org/ [super > >> > > > > > > > >>> minimalist] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aurora.incubator.apache.org/ > [ > >> > > > > > > > >>> quite > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> fancy > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> looking ] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both in my opinion are beautifully > done > >> > > > > > > > >> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> make > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> easy > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> get > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think these (and others) provide > >> great > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> examples > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> both > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sides > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spectrum have merit. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is most important to me is > that we > >> > > > > > > > >> as > >> > > > > > > > >>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> community > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> rally > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> behind > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the expertise and willingness > to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> contribute > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> space. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Joe > >> > > > > > > > >> Witt < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both are bootstrap based. Each is > an > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> iterative > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> improvement. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And we > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep iterating as folks have time, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> willingness, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> expertise > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that this new look does not > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> distinguish a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> brand. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> But > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we're > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mature enough to worry about that > yet. > >> > > > > > > > >>> We > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> just > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> need > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> enough > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> info laid out enough to help grow a > >> > > > > > > > >>>> community > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> get > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> folks > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> info > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need. We need it laid out in a way > >> > > > > > > > >> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> multiple > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> folks > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> can > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribute. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once we have a release, recruit > some > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> committers, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progress on > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Apache Way and grow then > perhaps > >> > > > > > > > >>>> branding > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> becomes a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bigger > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deal. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..this motivates me to spawn > another > >> > > > > > > > >>> thread > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> about > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> type > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to be... > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:13 AM, > Adam > >> > > > > > > > >>> Taft > >> > > > > > > > >>>> < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This isn't a downvote -- I think > it > >> > > > > > > > >>> indeed > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> looks > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> good. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> But > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructive criticism... > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the mockup looks like a > very > >> > > > > > > > >>>> generic > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> "bootstrap" > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> site, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> similar > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> million other bootstrap based > sites. > >> > > > > > > > >>> I'd > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> personally > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> almost > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existing utilitarian website over > a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> bootstrap > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> theme, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> simply > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't try to be anything more > than > >> > > > > > > > >>> what > >> > > > > > > > >>>> it > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> is. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This approach might be an > acceptable > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> tradeoff > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> for > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> project; > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bootstrap look & feel is > obviously a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> resource > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> savings > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right price point. But the site > >> > > > > > > > >> mockup > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> definitely > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distinguish > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache NiFi "brand" in anyway. In > >> fact > >> > > > > > > > >>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> opposite, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> brand > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watered > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down with this look. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As a funny side note, humorously > for > >> > > > > > > > >> me, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> was > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> first > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thought > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head when I saw the site: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2010-04-01/ > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adam > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:39 PM, > >> Aldrin > >> > > > > > > > >>>> Piri > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> < > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In partial fulfillment of the > goals > >> > > > > > > > >> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> NIFI-162, I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> set > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> some > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aside > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put together something a bit more > >> > > > > > > > >>>> visually > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> appealing > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> as a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> face > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My work can be found at: > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://github.com/apiri/apache-nifi-site > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, work focused around > the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> homepage, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> but > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> similar > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> styles > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applied to more content driven > pages > >> > > > > > > > >>>> minus > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> large > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headlining > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sections. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The relevant technology colophon > is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> provided > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> README > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Github > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> primarily driven by Bootstrap, > >> > > > > > > > >>> existing > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> image > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> resources > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project and current site, and > other > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> "artwork" > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> which I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> created > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am neither a UX expert nor am > I a > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> renowned > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> front > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> end > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designer, > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input is welcome. As a "version > >> > > > > > > > >> 1.1" > >> > > > > > > > >>> I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> would > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> like to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjust > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> converge more with the > application. > >> > > > > > > > >>>> Ideas > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> for > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> are > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclusive > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such as bringing the toolbar > styling > >> > > > > > > > >>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> color > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> scheme > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> from > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the site. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this seems like a reasonable > path > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> forward > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> there > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sufficient > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support, I can look at the next > >> > > > > > > > >> steps > >> > > > > > > > >>> to > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> get > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> this > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project, optimization, and > >> > > > > > > > >> integration > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> with > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> application > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To aid in showing the intangibles > >> > > > > > > > >> that > >> > > > > > > > >>>>> can't > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> seen > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> from > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> image, I > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a copy of this design hosted at > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aldrinpiri.com/apache-nifi/. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> links are currently > nonfunctional as > >> > > > > > > > >>>> they > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>> were > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> taken > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> from > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site. > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --Aldrin > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
