hi,
yes, this solution "just" requires a sed on all defconfig files, and
avoids having to specify the directory name in the git clone command,
which can easily be forgotten.
if I can express my taste on this extra minor choice I think nuttx-apps
looks better than nuttx_apps
Sebastien
On 6/28/22 06:15, alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote:
I think that we should modify the paths so that we use
nuttx and nuttx_apps folders.
In my opinion this will be less confusing for the users
Best regards
Alin
-----Original Message-----
From: Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info>
Sent: den 28 juni 2022 02:55
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate NuttX as TLP
Congratulations on NuttX Graduation and all of the achievements! :-)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 6:18 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
I don't know you guys but I hate this incubator-nuttx and
incubator-nuttx-apps repositories names.
I hope we get github.com/apache/nuttx and github.com/apache/apps soon
(hope they accept we use this /apps name, will make our users life
easier!)
+1 :-)
How about something like nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps ?
It was not clear for me what apps are and if they are mandatory..
keeping apache/apps could be even more confusing.. also I usually keep `.git`
suffix for directories that keep git repos and that was not working here :-)
Maybe just nuttx + nuttx/nuttx_apps where apps are git submodule kept as it is
right now in a sperate repo for easier maintenance? :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ,
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.tomek.cedro.info__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!6HrO-4qVO1mY_faiW-6kxCv6sQxyeUdYuL9_HLWZCaxV9eclVaPiUFuThqR-7C8RXGs6X-G2MtYdfE46lg$
