This was only a suggestion, I like it because with this you have more information than just a number. But I will not push more for this...
Jacques ----- Original Message ----- From: "David E. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <dev@ofbiz.apache.org> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 5:13 PM Subject: Re: Board Report Draft - Please Review ASAP > > On Jan 13, 2007, at 4:15 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > BTW David, I put a comment as answer to your question about release in > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan? > > focusedCommentId=1027#comment-1027 > > Yeah, this sort of thing should probably be discussed on the mailing > list and then once discussed we can decide if any change to the > document needs to be done. > > I'm not so sure about the Ubuntu versioning mechanism... I think it > is much more clear if each branch we do is represented by a major/ > minor version number change, and then follow on releases within that > branch would be represented by the sub-minor version number change. > > Anyway, this is described in the General Release Policies. > > Are you saying that you propose to do this differently? > > -David > > >
