> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Adrian Crum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Sent: 4/10/07, 10:16:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Screen Widget Ideas
> 
> David E. Jones wrote:
> > 
> > On Apr 9, 2007, at 6:12 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> > 
> >>> The goal for all ofbiz tools is to do 90% of what you need  
> >>> efficiently and generically and quickly, not 100% of what you need  
> >>> pooy. The form wigdet is not and never will be html or fill the  same 
> >>> need.
> >>
> >>
> >> The funny thing about the widgets is, they make complex tasks  simple, 
> >> and at the same time they make simple tasks complex. In my  opinion, 
> >> the widgets get a C in doing 90% of what I need efficiently.
> > 
> > 
> > So, what sort of thing are you looking for to meet your particular  needs?
> > 
> > -David
> 
> Here's an example:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-875
> 
> That modification has little to do with the original message in this thread, 
> but 
> it demonstrates how I believe the widgets can be improved upon to make simple 
> tasks simple.
> 
> Then there is the example I gave earlier of wanting to assign IDs and styles 
> to 
> certain widgets. At the time it had been suggested to wrap the widget in a 
> container, then assign an ID and a style to the container. I chose to improve 
> the widget instead.
> 
> So, little things that should be simple and straightforward are sometimes 
> complicated or impossible.
> 
> Another example: Screenlets are common repetitive visual elements in OFBiz. 
> To 
> compose a screenlet using the screen widgets takes a lot of XML code. So, 
> bottom 
> line, a simple task is made complicated. I would like to develop a screenlet 
> widget - that would render a screenlet from a few attributes. Before I get 
> started on that though, I would like to clean up the existing widget java 
> code. 
> That's what prompted this thread.

Why not just use the screenlet decorator?

I guess this particular thing is not something that has come up for me as a 
real pain point when developing...

-David

Reply via email to