Mmm, actually it's the same for JQyery. Dojo is Apache licence compliant (Academic Free Licence, BSD Licence).
I suppose it's the main reason we can find Dojo in OFBiz... Jacques De : "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > LGPL 3.0 : can be used in OFBiz but no changes to the lib are authorised. If > they are issues you are trapped ! > > Jacques > > De : "Mike Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > How about EXT http://extjs.com/ > > > > I've used this to turn all the OFBiz table into a data grid. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 14:50 > > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever > > > > I don't know much about JQuery, but philosophically yes +1 > > > > Jacques > > > > > > De : "Raj Saini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I second, JQuery is lightweight and can work with other Widget toolkits > > > such as yahoo. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Raj > > > Ean Schuessler wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 07:10:49 pm Anil K Patel wrote: > > > > > > > >> I have worked little bit in Dojo and then was forced into using > > > >> Prototypejs. I found Prototype lot easy to use. It just makes > > Javascript > > > >> a usable Javascript (In my opinion). > > > >> > > > >> There are few libraries that build on top of Prototype for providing > > > >> widgets. We have used them and found really easy. I have a new Checkout > > > >> Process for ecommerce implemented using > > > >> Prototype/Validation.js/scriptaculous. I share it soon. > > > >> > > > >> My vote is for Prototype.js. > > > >> > > > > > > > > JQuery, jquery, jquery! > > > > > > > > http://jquery.com/blog/2006/08/20/why-jquerys-philosophy-is-better/ > > > > > > > > ps. jquery > > > > > > > > > > > > >
