Hi Jonathon,

How do you built dojo into the Widget Engine? Is there any code I can reuse?

And I think Dojo it's powerfull, I like dojo to deal js as the div.

Thanks,

Jack Guo


2007/9/12, Jonathon -- Improov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Al,
>
> I had built Dojo into the Widget Engine already, in one of my own private
> implementations. (Beyond
> that, I had also done several nifty AJAX stuff in Widget Engine, like
> making the next/prev buttons
> AJAXed).
>
> The exercise has told me that integrating any other javascript toolkit
> into the Widget Engine will
> follow similar lines. I have the distinct feeling that the Widget Engine
> can be built to support
> more than 1 toolkit!
>
> Let me know which toolkit wins your votes, and I'll see if I can kick
> start the integration exercise.
>
> Jonathon
>
> Al Byers wrote:
> > Where did we leave the javascript toolkit debate? Googling does not show
> any
> > clear cut direction.
> >
> > I have a question about Prototype. Does it have layout widgets like Dojo
> > (eg. TabContainer, SplitContainer, AccordianContainer)? I don't see them
> in
> > the API for Prototype.
> >
> > I think we need to make a choice primarily because it will be possible
> to
> > integrate a toolkit with the screen widget technology and it won't be
> > practical to do more than one. Right now I feel comfortable with Dojo as
> the
> > primary js toolkit, but that could be because I am not familiar with
> others.
> > I like the strong layout widgets that Dojo has and it seems to have
> > everything else, too, and I don't think that is a bad thing. I am able
> to do
> > a file upload within Dojo and get a JSON response and I think that is an
> > important consideration. I have read that Dojo is more Java, workman
> like
> > and Prototype is more Ruby and elegant. If that is the case, I would opt
> for
> > Dojo.
> >
> > If nothing else, it might be useful to use this thread to measure where
> the
> > community's interest lies. So respond with nothing more than a vote if
> you
> > care to.
> >
> > -Al
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.14/999 - Release Date:
> 9/10/2007 5:43 PM
>
>

Reply via email to