My first inclination is that taking legal advice from a company that is trying to sell you a license, probably isn't a good idea. They have a vested interest in trying to convince you not to use the MIT version.
Regardless, I think Taher's solution works in the short term and the other alternative is to revert back to a 2.x version until a suitable replacement is found. Looking at the commit logs it hasn't been very long since we switched from 2.x to 4.x for no other reason than "let's update everything!". Regards Scott On 14 June 2018 at 05:47, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > Yes good idea. I'll try to write next week... > > Jacques > > > > Le 13/06/2018 à 08:14, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >> >> [...] >>> Of course we need to ask the legal team before taking a formal decision >>> about it. >>> I think we have now enough material to ask, and without opposition I'll >>> create a LEGAL Jira in a week. >>> >> >> I think it would be useful if you will post the draft of the text for the >> Jira ticket to this list for community's review before submitting it to >> Legal. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Jacopo >> >> >
