I am not able to find the thread, But I remember we had already a discussion regarding the same topic.
Kind Regards, Deepak Dixit On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:37 PM Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> wrote: > I have not time to elaborate in-depth right now, but just a quick food > for thought: > > Having these fields in every entity *by default* allows detailed > tracking of users which might be unwanted. I know that this is a > sensible topic in companies and affects privacy protection. > > I am not sure how the selection of entities with these fields was done, > maybe others can add insights. > > Regards, > > Michael Brohl > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > > > Am 24.04.19 um 12:40 schrieb Pierre Smits: > > Thanks Michael, > > > > So we should keep those *TxStamp fields. > > > > But what about the second suggestion about having the > 'createdByUserLogin' > > and 'lastModifiedByUserLogin' fields added to the internal fields set? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Pierre Smits > > > > *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* > > *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* > > Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer > > *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without > privileges) > > since 2008* > > Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:20 PM Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de > > > > wrote: > > > >> These fields are not the same, they can differ. The TX fields mark the > >> transaction timestamp while the non TX fields mark the "real" update > >> time. You can see it when you watch closely in the database. All changes > >> made within an transaction have the same tx timestamp. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Michael Brohl > >> > >> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > >> > >> > >> Am 24.04.19 um 09:48 schrieb Pierre Smits: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> Currently our functions inject following internal fields into the model > >> of > >>> each entity: > >>> > >>> - createdStamp > >>> - createdTxStamp > >>> - lastUpdatedStamp > >>> - lastUpdatedTxStamp > >>> > >>> All of the fields above are of the field type definition 'date-time', > >>> giving for java: java.sql.Timestamp, and for sql: TIMESTAMP. This means > >>> that the createdTxStamp is the same as createdStamp and > >> lastUpdatedTxStamp > >>> is the same as lastUpdatedStamp. > >>> > >>> Should we get rid of the redundant fields? > >>> > >>> Also, a lot of entity definitions in the various models have the > >>> 'createdByUserLogin' and 'lastModifiedByUserLogin' added. > >>> > >>> Should we have these fields added to the internal fields set so that > >> these > >>> are always injected into the model of each entity, and always filled? > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Pierre Smits > >>> > >>> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* > >>> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* > >>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer > >>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without > >> privileges) > >>> since 2008* > >>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer > >>> > >> > >
