Thanks, Jacques for details and findings.
I think this thread is now concluded. :)

--
Best Regards,
Suraj Khurana
Technical Consultant





On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:48 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:

> Oh, rather better refer to
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins
>
> So it's at
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins/builds/769 and
> the msggateway component
>
> We know Rishi is working on it
>
> Le 13/05/2019 à 06:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> > At least I can say that it was before March 30:
> >
> > https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFramework?numbuilds=100
> >
> > Le 13/05/2019 à 06:28, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> >> Thanks Suraj,
> >>
> >> Unfortunately since another issue came in and it's now harder to
> detect.:
> >>
> >>    <<No inventory reservations available; cannot pack this item! [101]>>
> >>
> >> Have you an idea?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >> Le 11/05/2019 à 13:59, Suraj Khurana a écrit :
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Done at rev #1859111
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Suraj Khurana
> >>> Technical Consultant
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:24 AM Suraj Khurana <
> suraj.khur...@hotwax.co>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sure Jacques,
> >>>>
> >>>> I will get this done by the weekend. Please proceed in case of any
> blocker
> >>>> or urgency. I am also inclined with your thoughts.
> >>>> Thanks in advance !!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>> Suraj Khurana
> >>>> Technical Consultant
> >>>>
> >>>> *HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd*
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:17 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> >>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Suraj,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any chances? I don't mind duplicated data as I mentioned answering to
> >>>>> Pierre
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jacques
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Le 27/04/2019 à 15:36, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> >>>>>> Thanks Suraj,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can't we avoid the duplicated data?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jacques
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Le 27/04/2019 à 15:17, Suraj Khurana a écrit :
> >>>>>>> Hello team,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have checked and found that there is a data dependency of
> >>>>>>> workEffortId=9000 in the test case which is available in
> >>>>> plugins/projectmgr
> >>>>>>> component.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This was the main reason testIntegration was failing without having
> >>>>> plugins
> >>>>>>> component. I will take care of it and add respective dependent
> data on
> >>>>>>> order test data file.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think its making sense now and we don't need to revert now.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>> Suraj Khurana
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:14 AM Suraj Khurana <
> >>>>> suraj.khur...@hotwax.co>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sure Jacques,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I am into it today and if got nothing I will remove
> OrderTests.groovy
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Suraj Khurana
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:27 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> >>>>>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Suraj,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think that, as suggested by Mathieu, in the meantime it's
> better to
> >>>>>>>>> remove “OrderTests.groovy”
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Because it could hide other issues else reported by Buildbot
> which
> >>>>> is our
> >>>>>>>>> last safeguard
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Jacques
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Le 25/04/2019 à 10:52, Pierre Smits a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Mathieu,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to move this forward?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice
> President*
> >>>>>>>>>> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> >>>>>>>>>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> >>>>>>>>>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without
> >>>>>>>>> privileges)
> >>>>>>>>>> since 2008*
> >>>>>>>>>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 2:25 PM Pierre Smits <
> >>>>> pierresm...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should move the load aspects regarding tests out of
> the
> >>>>> test
> >>>>>>>>>>> suite invocations altogether.
> >>>>>>>>>>> The gradlew tasks states:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> task testIntegration(group: ofbizServer) {
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> dependsOn 'ofbiz --test'
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> description 'Run OFBiz integration tests; You must run loadAll
> >>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>> running this task'
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> IMO, loading test data could be part of the loadAll task.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice
> President*
> >>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> >>>>>>>>>>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without
> >>>>>>>>> privileges)
> >>>>>>>>>>> since 2008*
> >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 1:56 PM Mathieu Lirzin <
> >>>>>>>>> mathieu.lir...@nereide.fr>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits <pierresm...@apache.org> writes:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe there are a few more where testing individual
> >>>>> test-suites
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and/or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> test-cases are dependent on data loaded in other test-suites
> >>>>> and/or
> >>>>>>>>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> test-cases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have the same experience.  Moreover another source of
> fragility
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> that tests depend on other tests within a single OFBiz
> >>>>> “test-case”,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> meaning one test can depend on the data produced by another
> test.
> >>>>>>>>> This
> >>>>>>>>>>>> is acceptable for a “simple-method-test” because the order of
> >>>>>>>>> execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>> is sequential and managed by OFBiz, but this is problematic
> for
> >>>>> JUnit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> tests (Groovy, Java) because the order while being
> deterministic
> >>>>>>>>> depends
> >>>>>>>>>>>> on the arbitrary order imposed by the JVM.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> For example I know for a fact that “QuoteTests.groovy” is
> >>>>> suffering
> >>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>> that issue.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> While I don't hear/read about failing testIntegration (except
> >>>>> where
> >>>>>>>>>>>> code in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the base is faulty, not when test-suites/cases are faulty),
> I see
> >>>>>>>>>>>> following
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> failures in test executions in OFBiz against jdk11:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>       1. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test
> component=webapp
> >>>>>>>>> --test
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=webapptests'.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>       2. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test
> >>>>> component=accounting
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --test
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=invoicetest'.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>       3. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test
> component=order
> >>>>>>>>> --test
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=ordertests'.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>       4. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test
> >>>>> component=product
> >>>>>>>>> --test
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=producttests'.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have these test failing also when doing the test
> execution
> >>>>>>>>> against
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> jdk8?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Caveat: I recently set this up, so there may still be some
> >>>>>>>>>>>> configuration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> issues in the jdk11-test setup.. *
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have just tested the “ordertests” test-suite with Icedtea
> 3.7
> >>>>>>>>> (jdk-8)
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and it is still failing, so it seems unrelated in that case.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mathieu Lirzin
> >>>>>>>>>>>> GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to