I hope this is fixed after rev #1859267. -- Best Regards, Suraj Khurana Technical Consultant
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 3:10 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Thanks Rishi, > > It seems it's something else now. > > I'll also have a look, hopefully today > > Jacques > > Le 14/05/2019 à 11:22, Rishi Solanki a écrit : > > Below are the test cases failure list on running "cleanAll loadAll > > testIntegration" > > 1) [JUNIT (failure)] - > production-run-tests.testCreateProductionRunForOrder > > : Assertion failed: ( NOT empty[originalOrderItemShipGrpInvRes=null]) > > 2) [JUNIT (failure)] - > > invoice-per-shipment-tests.testInvoicePerShipmentSetFalse : No inventory > > reservations available; cannot pack this item! [101] > > 3) [JUNIT (failure)] - productRentalOrder-test : Warning: no shipments > > created; could not find anything ready and needing to be shipped. > > 4) [JUNIT (failure)] - productServiceOrder-test : Warning: no shipments > > created; could not find anything ready and needing to be shipped. > > 5) [JUNIT (failure)] - configurableServiceOrder-test : Warning: no > > shipments created; could not find anything ready and needing to be > shipped. > > 6) [JUNIT (failure)] - > production-run-tests.testCreateProductionRunForOrder > > : Assertion failed: ( NOT empty[originalOrderItemShipGrpInvRes=null]) > > 7) [JUNIT (failure)] - > > invoice-per-shipment-tests.testInvoicePerShipmentSetFalse : No inventory > > reservations available; cannot pack this item! [101] > > > > Are these are somehow related to message component? > > > > Looking more if data in the message component loaded or not. If found > > something then will come back. > > > > Best Regards, > > -- > > *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > > Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki* > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/> > > Direct: +91-9893287847 > > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:15 PM Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Jacques, > >> I have completed my in hand items and closed the ticket - > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10457 > >> > >> Nothing is pending in my knowledge also sms settings are disabled by > >> default. I'll check the tests in case something is not working due to > >> message component then I will fix that. If you have something handy to > fix > >> then please share, I will look into it. > >> > >> I will get back on this soon. Thanks! > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> -- > >> *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > >> HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > >> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, > >> Indore, M.P 452010 > >> Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki* > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/> > >> Direct: +91-9893287847 > >> > >> > >> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:56 PM Suraj Khurana <suraj.khur...@hotwax.co > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks, Jacques for details and findings. > >>> I think this thread is now concluded. :) > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best Regards, > >>> Suraj Khurana > >>> Technical Consultant > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:48 PM Jacques Le Roux < > >>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Oh, rather better refer to > >>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins > >>>> > >>>> So it's at > >>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins/builds/769 > >>> and > >>>> the msggateway component > >>>> > >>>> We know Rishi is working on it > >>>> > >>>> Le 13/05/2019 à 06:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >>>>> At least I can say that it was before March 30: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbizTrunkFramework?numbuilds=100 > >>>>> > >>>>> Le 13/05/2019 à 06:28, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >>>>>> Thanks Suraj, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Unfortunately since another issue came in and it's now harder to > >>>> detect.: > >>>>>> <<No inventory reservations available; cannot pack this item! > >>> [101]>> > >>>>>> Have you an idea? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Le 11/05/2019 à 13:59, Suraj Khurana a écrit : > >>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Done at rev #1859111 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>> Suraj Khurana > >>>>>>> Technical Consultant > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:24 AM Suraj Khurana < > >>>> suraj.khur...@hotwax.co> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sure Jacques, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I will get this done by the weekend. Please proceed in case of any > >>>> blocker > >>>>>>>> or urgency. I am also inclined with your thoughts. > >>>>>>>> Thanks in advance !! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>> Suraj Khurana > >>>>>>>> Technical Consultant > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> *HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd* > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:17 PM Jacques Le Roux < > >>>>>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Suraj, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Any chances? I don't mind duplicated data as I mentioned > >>> answering to > >>>>>>>>> Pierre > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Le 27/04/2019 à 15:36, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Suraj, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Can't we avoid the duplicated data? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Le 27/04/2019 à 15:17, Suraj Khurana a écrit : > >>>>>>>>>>> Hello team, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I have checked and found that there is a data dependency of > >>>>>>>>>>> workEffortId=9000 in the test case which is available in > >>>>>>>>> plugins/projectmgr > >>>>>>>>>>> component. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> This was the main reason testIntegration was failing without > >>> having > >>>>>>>>> plugins > >>>>>>>>>>> component. I will take care of it and add respective dependent > >>>> data on > >>>>>>>>>>> order test data file. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I think its making sense now and we don't need to revert now. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>> Suraj Khurana > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:14 AM Suraj Khurana < > >>>>>>>>> suraj.khur...@hotwax.co> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sure Jacques, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I am into it today and if got nothing I will remove > >>>> OrderTests.groovy > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Suraj Khurana > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:27 PM Jacques Le Roux < > >>>>>>>>>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Suraj, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that, as suggested by Mathieu, in the meantime it's > >>>> better to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> remove “OrderTests.groovy” > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it could hide other issues else reported by Buildbot > >>>> which > >>>>>>>>> is our > >>>>>>>>>>>>> last safeguard > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 25/04/2019 à 10:52, Pierre Smits a écrit : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mathieu, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to move this forward? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice > >>>> President* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC > >>> Member* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor > >>> (without > >>>>>>>>>>>>> privileges) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> since 2008* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 2:25 PM Pierre Smits < > >>>>>>>>> pierresm...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should move the load aspects regarding tests out > of > >>>> the > >>>>>>>>> test > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suite invocations altogether. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The gradlew tasks states: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> task testIntegration(group: ofbizServer) { > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependsOn 'ofbiz --test' > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> description 'Run OFBiz integration tests; You must run > >>> loadAll > >>>>>>>>> before > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running this task' > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, loading test data could be part of the loadAll task. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice > >>>> President* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC > >>> Member* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor > >>> (without > >>>>>>>>>>>>> privileges) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since 2008* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 1:56 PM Mathieu Lirzin < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mathieu.lir...@nereide.fr> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pierre Smits <pierresm...@apache.org> writes: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe there are a few more where testing individual > >>>>>>>>> test-suites > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and/or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test-cases are dependent on data loaded in other > >>> test-suites > >>>>>>>>> and/or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test-cases. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have the same experience. Moreover another source of > >>>> fragility > >>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that tests depend on other tests within a single OFBiz > >>>>>>>>> “test-case”, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meaning one test can depend on the data produced by > another > >>>> test. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is acceptable for a “simple-method-test” because the order > >>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> execution > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is sequential and managed by OFBiz, but this is > problematic > >>>> for > >>>>>>>>> JUnit > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests (Groovy, Java) because the order while being > >>>> deterministic > >>>>>>>>>>>>> depends > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the arbitrary order imposed by the JVM. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example I know for a fact that “QuoteTests.groovy” is > >>>>>>>>> suffering > >>>>>>>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that issue. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While I don't hear/read about failing testIntegration > >>> (except > >>>>>>>>> where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the base is faulty, not when test-suites/cases are > >>> faulty), > >>>> I see > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failures in test executions in OFBiz against jdk11: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test > >>>> component=webapp > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --test > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=webapptests'. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test > >>>>>>>>> component=accounting > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --test > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=invoicetest'. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test > >>>> component=order > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --test > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=ordertests'. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Execution failed for task ':ofbiz --test > >>>>>>>>> component=product > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --test > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitename=producttests'. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have these test failing also when doing the test > >>>> execution > >>>>>>>>>>>>> against > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jdk8? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Caveat: I recently set this up, so there may still be > >>> some > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues in the jdk11-test setup.. * > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have just tested the “ordertests” test-suite with > Icedtea > >>>> 3.7 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (jdk-8) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it is still failing, so it seems unrelated in that > >>> case. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mathieu Lirzin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
