>>It was working for a very long time and I suddenly these burst of duplicates, as Aditya found, don't you? Exactly
>> Yes that's it. Who will handle it? I will raise a Jira at infra if it's fine. On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 5:55 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Matthieu, > > Le 13/06/2019 à 14:08, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : > > Hello Deepak, > > > > Deepak Dixit <dee...@apache.org> writes: > > > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 4:14 PM Mathieu Lirzin < > mathieu.lir...@nereide.fr> wrote: > >> > >> Hello Aditya, > >> > >> Aditya Sharma <adityasha...@apache.org> writes: > >> > >> > We can configure reply-to email address for the mailing list which > means > >> > when the user clicks the reply button, the specified email address > will be > >> > automatically in the *To* field. > >> > >> I know some people here prefer their personal email address to not > >> appear in the ‘To’ header when replying to them and the mailing-list > but > >> that's a personnal preference that can/should be defined only by the > >> sender of a message not the administrators of a mailing-list. [1] > >> > >> Please configure your email client to add the ‘Reply-to’ header > >> accordingly, but let others have different preferences. :-) > >> > >> I think if we are doing communication on the mailing list, its good to > >> have mailing list address in reply-to irrespective personal > >> preference. We can ask infra for the same. > > I will answer to you by using a citation from > > <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html> > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > Some administrators justify Reply-To munging by saying, "All responses > > should go directly to the list anyway." This is arrogant. You should > > allow me to decide exactly how I wish to respond to a message. If I feel > > a public response is justified, I'll hit the "g" key and tell Elm to do > > a group-reply. If I believe a private response is more appropriate, I'll > > use "r" to send one. Please allow me the freedom to decide how to handle > > a message. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > > Please read the arguments provided by this short article. I hope it will > > let you understand the drawbacks of what you are proposing. > > > > Thanks. > > Then we should ask what Infra was doing before and discuss about it. > I hope that we will find a consensus and in the process discover why this > changed recently. I like the way it worked so far > > Jacques > >
