I went through the post shared by Mathieu, Jacques along with this post[1] that shows both the sides vividly and it all makes sense. Different people may have different preferences for it but we have to choose what favors the community. I can see many instances on lists where users replied to the personal email and we cannot really restrict anyone to use reply or reply-all. I will create a Jira at infra so that previous arrangement is restored.
1. https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html Thanks and regards, Aditya Sharma On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Le 30/06/2019 à 16:08, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : > > Hello Jacques > > > > Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> writes: > > > >> The question is should we vote? > >> > >> So far it all depends on me and my -0.2 added to Paul's -0.8 after > >> Mathieu convinced me that it would be better do to otherwise. > >> > >> If Mathieu does not want to use his veto, I'll not apply mine. It was > >> like that for years and it seems everybody was happy, including > >> Mathieu, Paul and I, we never complained. > > I am not familiar with Apache voting policies, However according to [1] > > it seems that people are not expected to use their veto for procedural > > issues. > > > > Most people in this conversation have already expressed their opinion in > > favour of the ‘reply-to’ munging and have not been convinced by my > > arguments, so I don't think we need to formally vote. > > > > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > That's simpler indeed. We could argue that it's code and a vote could be > done. But it's not OFBiz code so I I guess it would be far fetched and most > would not agree. > > Anyway, I'll continue to use Reply-to-list, and we will not receive > unwanted copies, it's OK with me. > > Jacques > >
