Thanks Aditya,
Jacques
Le 18/07/2019 à 14:59, Aditya Sharma a écrit :
Here is the Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18768
Thanks and regards,
Aditya Sharma
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:39 PM Aditya Sharma <[email protected]>
wrote:
I went through the post shared by Mathieu, Jacques along with this post[1]
that shows both the sides vividly and it all makes sense.
Different people may have different preferences for it but we have to
choose what favors the community.
I can see many instances on lists where users replied to the personal
email and we cannot really restrict anyone to use reply or reply-all.
I will create a Jira at infra so that previous arrangement is restored.
1. https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html
Thanks and regards,
Aditya Sharma
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
Le 30/06/2019 à 16:08, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit :
Hello Jacques
Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> writes:
The question is should we vote?
So far it all depends on me and my -0.2 added to Paul's -0.8 after
Mathieu convinced me that it would be better do to otherwise.
If Mathieu does not want to use his veto, I'll not apply mine. It was
like that for years and it seems everybody was happy, including
Mathieu, Paul and I, we never complained.
I am not familiar with Apache voting policies, However according to [1]
it seems that people are not expected to use their veto for procedural
issues.
Most people in this conversation have already expressed their opinion in
favour of the ‘reply-to’ munging and have not been convinced by my
arguments, so I don't think we need to formally vote.
[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
That's simpler indeed. We could argue that it's code and a vote could be
done. But it's not OFBiz code so I I guess it would be far fetched and most
would not agree.
Anyway, I'll continue to use Reply-to-list, and we will not receive
unwanted copies, it's OK with me.
Jacques
