Here is the Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18768
Thanks and regards, Aditya Sharma On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:39 PM Aditya Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > I went through the post shared by Mathieu, Jacques along with this post[1] > that shows both the sides vividly and it all makes sense. > Different people may have different preferences for it but we have to > choose what favors the community. > I can see many instances on lists where users replied to the personal > email and we cannot really restrict anyone to use reply or reply-all. > I will create a Jira at infra so that previous arrangement is restored. > > 1. https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html > > Thanks and regards, > Aditya Sharma > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 8:23 PM Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Le 30/06/2019 à 16:08, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : >> > Hello Jacques >> > >> > Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> writes: >> > >> >> The question is should we vote? >> >> >> >> So far it all depends on me and my -0.2 added to Paul's -0.8 after >> >> Mathieu convinced me that it would be better do to otherwise. >> >> >> >> If Mathieu does not want to use his veto, I'll not apply mine. It was >> >> like that for years and it seems everybody was happy, including >> >> Mathieu, Paul and I, we never complained. >> > I am not familiar with Apache voting policies, However according to [1] >> > it seems that people are not expected to use their veto for procedural >> > issues. >> > >> > Most people in this conversation have already expressed their opinion in >> > favour of the ‘reply-to’ munging and have not been convinced by my >> > arguments, so I don't think we need to formally vote. >> > >> > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> >> That's simpler indeed. We could argue that it's code and a vote could be >> done. But it's not OFBiz code so I I guess it would be far fetched and most >> would not agree. >> >> Anyway, I'll continue to use Reply-to-list, and we will not receive >> unwanted copies, it's OK with me. >> >> Jacques >> >>
