That could be a good idea Gil,
As I just said to Nicolas and Taher, though I'm not sure why (but the tools
missing?), I see less backporting since we turned to Git.
Maybe having less branches to backport to would help indeed...
Le 24/01/2020 à 17:36, Gil Portenseigne a écrit :
I wonder if it is bad for the project to have 2 years between two
releases, 16 => 18 => 20
WDYT ?
Gil
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 05:31:14PM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 24/01/2020 à 15:09, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
On 24/01/2020 14:57, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I must say I'm mostly against because of the surplus of effort
necessary to backport to both R17 and R18
About R20, as Pierre Smits mentioned in Slack should we not create a
R19 before ;)
If we follow the years, 2019 is now behind.
Actually it's not a set in stone rule, we could still create a R19 branch, why
wait one year more, and at least 2 years to publish R20?
Jacques
