Added my comments on the technical aspects of the proposal at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11296
On 2020/01/29 08:26:00, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Mathieu, Samuel, > > You were the most visible proponents of this. After 5 days w/o exchanges > should we consider the idea is abandoned or should we start a vote? > > Without answers I'll consider the idea abandoned, which is a pity IMO. > > Thanks > > Jacques > > Le 24/01/2020 à 14:12, Michael Brohl a écrit : > > Hi Jacques, > > > > yes, my objection is targeted to the removal of the component-load.xml > > mechanism for applications and plugins. > > > > I don't think it will be a problem to remove it from framework/base/config/ > > and hard code the four existing components framework, themes, > > applications and plugins. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael Brohl > > > > ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > > > > > > Am 24.01.20 um 08:03 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > >> Le 24/01/2020 à 07:02, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> Since it's impossible to have both features (ie > >>> “base/config/component-load.xml” and <depends-on> present) and we don't > >>> reach a consensus I'll > >>> start a vote about it. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Jacques > >> > >> Before I start a vote, here is a last try to get a consensus. Michael in > >> his last email, answering to Pierre, made clear that he would not oppose > >> to <<Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”>>. His concern is more for > >> application and plugins component-load.xml. > >> > >> Could we not reach a consensus with this option? Mathieu, Samuel? > >> > >> Then we could discuss more about details for application and plugins > >> component-load.xml... > >> > >> Jacques > >> > > >
