Hi Jacques, The order of the application list looks fine to me. Understand we can still override the ordering if there is client requirement.
Regard, James On 2020/10/15 10:33:40 Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > I propose this order (did my best but quickly, could have missed things), > applications 1st: > > 1. partymgr(because you need parties to do anything) > 2. catalog (because you need products to do anything) > 3. facility (because you need to store products to do anything) > 4. order (because it's there that things begin to "move") > 5. accounting (because it's there that things "end"; ar & ap should > disappear) > 6. content (because you need to associate contents to make things better) > 7. manufacturing (because OFBiz is also an ERP) > 8. sfa (because people are often looking for a CRM, BTW most them don't know > what SFA is) > 9. workeffort (this one could be above, but it's not obvious for most people) > 10. humanres (more important than below IMO) > 11. marketing (not sure about the place of this one) > 12. webtools (maybe higher?) > > ------------- (plugins start below) > > 1. rest (could be named api soon) > 2. projectmgr > 3. webpos > 4. bi > 5. birt > 6. myportal > 7. assetmaint > 8. ismgr > 9. scrum > 10. solr > 11. ebay > 12. firstdata > 13. ------------- (those are special, maybe above?) > 14. example > 15. exampleext > > ------------- (those plugins don't show atm but exist, maybe need more info > from backend menu?) > > 1. ecommerce > 2. ecomseo > 3. multiflex > 4. cmssite > 5. ebaystore > 6. ldap > 7. lucene > 8. passport > 9. pricat > 10. msggateway > > Please let me know your thoughts, TIA > > Jacques > > Le 11/10/2020 à 10:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > Hi James, > > > > I'd like to define an order for webapps in function of their OOTB > > importance. If we agree we should discuss the OOTB order of importance of > > applications webapps and then plugins. > > > > I think we can quickly agree, and hope it would not open a Pandora box :) > > > > Also the feature should be easily changed by custom projects. Maybe > > documentation for that would be enough. > > > > Jacques > > > > Le 11/10/2020 à 06:37, James Yong a écrit : > >> Hi Jacques, > >> > >> What kind of ordering are you looking for the webapp menu items? > >> Customer specific ordering? > >> > >> Regards, > >> James > >> > >> On 2020/10/08 10:34:08, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Today Deepak answered on user ML > >>> https://markmail.org/message/syzvyyueheejyyce how to order webapps titles > >>> in main menu. > >>> BTW OOTB it would work for <webapp name="order" only if you do the same > >>> in birt where there is a 2nd <webapp name="order" ;) > >>> > >>> I think we already discussed that in the past but I don't clearly > >>> remember the result and I'd like to be sure about that. > >>> Should we not order webapps by default? > >>> > >>> For instance I don't like much to have firstdatapaymentgateway visible at > >>> the top in the main bar for the default theme. > >>> And globally having more important apps in 1st places would be better. > >>> > >>> What do you think? > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> >
