Hello Jacques, The order of menus which you are suggesting looks good to me as well.
Kind Regards, -- Pritam Kute On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 9:52 PM James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Jacques, > > The order of the application list looks fine to me. Understand we can > still override the ordering if there is client requirement. > > Regard, > James > > On 2020/10/15 10:33:40 Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I propose this order (did my best but quickly, could have missed > things), applications 1st: > > > > 1. partymgr(because you need parties to do anything) > > 2. catalog (because you need products to do anything) > > 3. facility (because you need to store products to do anything) > > 4. order (because it's there that things begin to "move") > > 5. accounting (because it's there that things "end"; ar & ap should > disappear) > > 6. content (because you need to associate contents to make things > better) > > 7. manufacturing (because OFBiz is also an ERP) > > 8. sfa (because people are often looking for a CRM, BTW most them don't > know what SFA is) > > 9. workeffort (this one could be above, but it's not obvious for most > people) > > 10. humanres (more important than below IMO) > > 11. marketing (not sure about the place of this one) > > 12. webtools (maybe higher?) > > > > ------------- (plugins start below) > > > > 1. rest (could be named api soon) > > 2. projectmgr > > 3. webpos > > 4. bi > > 5. birt > > 6. myportal > > 7. assetmaint > > 8. ismgr > > 9. scrum > > 10. solr > > 11. ebay > > 12. firstdata > > 13. ------------- (those are special, maybe above?) > > 14. example > > 15. exampleext > > > > ------------- (those plugins don't show atm but exist, maybe need more > info from backend menu?) > > > > 1. ecommerce > > 2. ecomseo > > 3. multiflex > > 4. cmssite > > 5. ebaystore > > 6. ldap > > 7. lucene > > 8. passport > > 9. pricat > > 10. msggateway > > > > Please let me know your thoughts, TIA > > > > Jacques > > > > Le 11/10/2020 à 10:12, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > > Hi James, > > > > > > I'd like to define an order for webapps in function of their OOTB > importance. If we agree we should discuss the OOTB order of importance of > > > applications webapps and then plugins. > > > > > > I think we can quickly agree, and hope it would not open a Pandora box > :) > > > > > > Also the feature should be easily changed by custom projects. Maybe > documentation for that would be enough. > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > Le 11/10/2020 à 06:37, James Yong a écrit : > > >> Hi Jacques, > > >> > > >> What kind of ordering are you looking for the webapp menu items? > > >> Customer specific ordering? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> James > > >> > > >> On 2020/10/08 10:34:08, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> Today Deepak answered on user ML > https://markmail.org/message/syzvyyueheejyyce how to order webapps titles > in main menu. > > >>> BTW OOTB it would work for <webapp name="order" only if you do the > same in birt where there is a 2nd <webapp name="order" ;) > > >>> > > >>> I think we already discussed that in the past but I don't clearly > remember the result and I'd like to be sure about that. > > >>> Should we not order webapps by default? > > >>> > > >>> For instance I don't like much to have firstdatapaymentgateway > visible at the top in the main bar for the default theme. > > >>> And globally having more important apps in 1st places would be > better. > > >>> > > >>> What do you think? > > >>> > > >>> Jacques > > >>> > > >>> > > >
