Hi Jacques, Will you be committing your fix/workaround under OFBIZ-12726?
If this change goes in to the code perhaps we should consider it a stop-gap to unblock moving OFBiz to JDK 17 as it seems to go again the spirit of strong encapsulation described in the migration guide you linked to: Migrating >From JDK 8 to Later JDK Releases (oracle.com) <https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/migrate/migrating-jdk-8-later-jdk-releases.html#GUID-7BB28E4D-99B3-4078-BDC4-FC24180CE82B>. I do support the workaround though as otherwise our option is to remain on older JDKs for the time being. We should probably have an aim to remove the workaround in a future release to try and bring ofbiz into compliance with JDK encapsulation - but this could be a 'back burner' task. Dan. On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 10:23, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I closed OFBIZ-12726 as fixed. > > Fortunately, simply adding --add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED > into applicationDefaultJvmArgs in build.gradle fixed the whole issues. > > Jacques > > Le 20/12/2022 à 12:28, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12726 for > that > > > > Le 20/12/2022 à 12:22, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >> Yes of course, it's a "typo" :) > >> > >> Le 20/12/2022 à 12:02, Michael Brohl a écrit : > >>> You are confusing me, Jacques. > >>> > >>> There is no release 20.01.01, its 22.01.01, right? > >>> > >>> Michael Brohl > >>> > >>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > >>> > >>> > >>> Am 20.12.22 um 11:55 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > >>>> You are right, confident as all seamed to go well running OFBiz, I > did not ran integration tests yet > >>>> > >>>> There is a lot of work to do regarding those. Currently we have 322 > errors and 190 failures. > >>>> I'm still confident that it should not be as hard as it looks to fix, > but indeed that could maybe take several weeks. > >>>> > >>>> So releasing 20.01.01 with gradle 7.6 and JDK 17, seems indeed a bit > early. > >>>> > >>>> In order to accelerate releasing 20.01.02, or next, with gradle 7.6 > and JDK 17, I suggest to run the demos with them. > >>>> > >>>> What do you guys think? > >>>> > >>>> Jacques > >>>> > >>>> Le 20/12/2022 à 09:33, Michael Brohl a écrit : > >>>>> In my opinion, before we do a RELEASE based on a new JDK (doing a > step from 8 to 17), we should have some serious testing with different > >>>>> environments etc. > >>>>> > >>>>> It's only a few weeks since the change which is much different from > the long stabilization phases we had in the past. > >>>>> > >>>>> How can we organize this? > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Michael Brohl > >>>>> > >>>>> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> PS: we could do some testing on Mac and Ubuntu but it will take some > time > >>>>> > >>>>> Am 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > >>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK > 17 without any problems. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> For that, we have OFBIZ-12400 "Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk > 11 -> 17" with 2 minor subtasks open. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I suggest that you also test on your side in order to allow to > release the 22.01.01 version with this configuration. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> TIA > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Le 19/12/2022 à 14:13, Nicolas Malin a écrit : > >>>>>>> Yeah, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm agree for the 22.01, > >>>>>>> I'm just disappointed to didn't find the time to present our work > on the new decorator and theme for this release, but sure for the next :) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Nicolas > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 16/12/2022 10:12, Daniel Watford wrote: > >>>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further > releases for > >>>>>>>> 18.12. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Has there been any releases for version 21.01, and if so should > they be > >>>>>>>> downloadable from the ofbiz website? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Dan > >>>>>>>> > -- Daniel Watford
