Hi Jacques,
actually, I was not talking about a new release... I was just
suggesting to provide some sort of downloadable snapshot of the trunk.
Jacopo
On Jun 1, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
Thanks for comment, so I would like to try by following http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan
for trunk and release.
I would then put attachments to this page when all would be tested
and ok (or maybe create a new specific child page for that). My
goal is to have something as easy as possible to reach, even for non-
technical persons.
I'm afraid that at the moment there are some issues in trunk when
running tests (run-tests). I did not test (run-tests) release for
a while. I suppose that I will need some efforts from the community.
I will let you know about that as soon as I will know.
BTW, do wee need tp keep this page http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Apache+OFBiz+Incubating+4.0.0+Test+Snapshot+Release
for
historical reasons ?
I remember suddenly that David has suggested recently that we work
on the framework in order to have separated from applications.
Should we wait to be in such a state before engaging a release
effort ?
Any other suggestions/recommandations anyone ?
Thanks
Jacques
PS : Maybe I'm a bit optimistic about all that, so it will depend of
my free time...
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We already talked about this subject in the past...
in my opinion a very simple (to manage for the community) and
effective way of helping new users, with minimal technical
knowledge, that just want to quickly taste how OFBiz is setup in
their pc, is to provide a weekly (or montly) zipped file of an
"svn export" (or a bigger "svn checkout") of the trunk.
Jacopo
On Jun 1, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi All,
We begin to have more and more unpleasant comments like this one
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Demo+and+Test+Setup+Guide?focusedCommentId=4377#comment-4377
Should we not take them into account one day or another even if
our build processes is so simple ?
Tough, maybe we could simply explain clearly in this page (and
perhaps some other concerned) why we prefer to do it that way ?
Jacques
