+1 for adding <call-groovy> in minilang. I can work on it in my free time as voluntarily if we would like to include it in framework release. Please let me know your thoughts on it.
-- Ashish On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for Confluence > BTW, should we not add a <call-groovy> in minilang (or did I miss > something) ? > > Jacques > > From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> Like Jacopo hinted at, this is a community-driven effort and is therefore >> a bit chaotic. >> >> The main thing I was requesting from the community is to focus on the >> framework for a little while so we can stabilize and clean up the >> framework in preparation for a binary release of it (leading toward a good >> binary release of the whole project... but starting with something smaller >> and easier). >> >> Anyway, I do have a list of things I've been thinking about and >> collecting, some from years ago. What I want to avoid though is making my >> list the official list, or even any sort of majority of the official list. >> In other words, I want this to be a community effort more than I want to >> have everything on my pet list done. >> >> Still, I do like the idea of starting to compile a list of things we'd >> all like to see go into the framework, and it's probably about time to do >> that rather than having more random (less communicated) efforts on >> different things. >> >> I'm thinking that a confluence/wiki page might be a better place for now >> though, given the tentative nature of some of these things, and often a >> need for discussion before more concrete plans are made. >> >> What do others think of this? >> >> -David >> >> >> On Jun 22, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >> I think that Bruno's suggestion of creating a "framework-candidate- >>> release-x" version in Jira would be useful, especially because there is no >>> official (or even unofficial) list of features/fixes to go in the >>> framework... probably each of us has its own preferences. >>> Of course we should try to keep the list small. >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Jun 21, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Bruno Busco wrote: >>> >>> David, >>>> I think it will be beneficial to all contributors to have a list of >>>> what we >>>> would like to have included in the framework-only release, don't you? >>>> >>>> It will tell how far we are and to have, generally, more efforts on >>>> these >>>> tasks. >>>> Why don't define the framework-only version in JIRA and schedule for >>>> that >>>> the task-list ? >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> -Bruno >>>> >>>> 2008/6/20 David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> >>>> >>>>> This looks good Adrian, thanks for working on it. >>>>> >>>>> This was on my own little list of things I'd like to see added to the >>>>> framework before we do the framework-only release, so I'm really happy >>>>> to >>>>> see it in! >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>
