Anil,
I think I found what you are talking about -
http://developers.sun.com/portalserver/reference/techart/jsr168/
Is that correct?
-Adrian
Anil Patel wrote:
I did not understand how "Apache Directory" is more appropriate.
What I mean is, There is UI behavior improvements that can be
implemented in ofbiz. Significant chunk of it comes as part of Portal
server implementation. Like its will be lot nicer if we did "Party
Profile" type page in Portal. Ofbiz Portlets "which is something
similar to ofbiz screenlets" be lot more Portable in enterprise. Like we
will be able to deliver them thru any other standard compliant Portal
Server.
Regards
Anil Patel
On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
An interesting idea, but it looks like it overlaps a lot of the OFBiz
framework. I believe Apache Directory would be be more appropriate.
-Adrian
Anil Patel wrote:
Sometime back I discussed similar things with Andrew and Tim at that
time they suggested to instead integrate Portal server into Ofbiz and
have portal server manage all that. I liked it because then we are
more in line with industry standards.
Regards
Anil Patel
On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hans Bakker wrote:
talking about preferences feature...wouldn't it be nice if the
screenlet
collapse is automatically remembered per user......
It depends upon the screenlet. In some cases that might be
unexpected behavior. In other words, users might expect a screenlet
to be expanded until they collapse it.
-Adrian
