+1, I would like to see it made the default prior to branching, any issues can be fixed and it does look much better.

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com



On 15/04/2009, at 2:52 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:

+1 - I totally agree. Let's fix this puppy up right - taking in the recommendations of everyone. This first impression is a much better one IMHO - but there are things that need to get tweaked to make it work right.

I'm all in favor of really looking into all of the organization around the apps and coming up with something that's:

1. Better looking
2. Easier to use
3. More intuitive
4. etc

yeah - I want it all, what can I say?

Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

----- "Sam Hamilton" <sam.hamil...@virtualvillage.com> wrote:

+1 for changing to something that gives a great first impression to
people new to OFBiz so would tend to want to use smoothfeather as the
default to carry the theme through from the website.

Sam


On 11/04/2009 06:21, "David Jones" <david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>
wrote:



Now that we have some nice themes in place I'm wondering if we
shouldn't change the default theme, especially for the back-end. The
old blue-grey-flat theme (which we should probably move to a theme
component) is functional and I suppose lightweight too, but perhaps
doesn't give the best first impression.

Right now we have 2 alternative themes for the back-end (the
bluelight
theme and the smoothfeather theme which is meant to look like the new
web site), and 1 alternative theme for ecommerce (the multiflex
theme).

One issue with all of these is they haven't been tested as thoroughly
as the old stuff, but I'm not too worried about that because there
are
issues with the new default lots of people will see it soon and we
should be able to get things fixed pretty fast. In my own testing
both
of the back-end ones seem pretty solid (I haven't played with the
ecommerce one yet).

Anyway, please respond with your thoughts on this. I considered
opening a vote, but a general discussion is probably better first
(and
a vote may not be needed depending on how this discussion goes).

BTW, yes, this is for marketing purposes and should happen before the
release branch next Tuesday.

-David

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to