Ha! Also we should use OFBIZ-2309 and its incorporated issues to state clearly in the release "paper" that these are known bugs that
will be quickly resolved in the following days
I think this is a pretty good argument in the favor of what I ask for ;o)
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
I agree it would be great to have it for the release.
I agree also that there are no real blockers so far (except it's bad on IE and we should state that and explain to use a *real
modern*
browser)
I'd like to complete OFBIZ-2309 by creating incorpotated issues from Ashish's,
Bruno's, Adrian's and Hans's remarks (of course if
someone wants to create them it would be great) And I'd like to fix these
issues and commit them on the new branch
Also, as I already said, I'd like to be able to i18n it after the freeze since
else it would be a real handicap for non English
speaking people (users are really insisting on good localisation) : OFBIZ-2306
Could we agree with that ? If we don't we will really shoot ourself in the foot (I don't see the point to have a clumsy UI for 2
years)
It's late and I'm exhausted, good night
Jacques
From: "Mike Bates" <mike.ba...@hotwaxmedia.com>
+1
On Apr 16, 2009, at 4:57 PM, David E Jones wrote:
What I'm trying to decide on is which is more important right now.... On the
one had there are issues with it so it's not the
best default, on the other hand it looks way better and more consistent with
the site and such and like Ean says would result
in a far better response from prospects.
The reason I proposed this is because there will be a big press release for
this release branch and relatively more people will
be downloading OFBiz and looking at the demo, and even if certain pages are
klunky that initial response may be more important
than the results of the thorough review (when they can change the theme too
if desired).
Anyway, my leaning is toward making it the default (hence this thread) in
order to improve the first response...
Are there issues, YES! Does it matter, yes. Does it matter more than looking
good for the first response, IMO: no.
-David
On Apr 16, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
I'm all for getting there but I will say that we should dig in before we pull
the trigger on it. I've been using it on my -dev
instance and the interface gets pretty hard to use in some places.
I agree, however, that it shouldn't take to much to tighten it up and the
customer response is night and day.
----- "Scott Gray" wrote:
+1, I would like to see it made the default prior to branching, any issues can
be fixed and it does look much better.
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO Brainfood.com
e...@brainfood.com - http://www.brainfood.com - 214-720-0700 x 315
