What about adding field(s) to the UserLogin entity to describe the user login record? It could be just a "description" field, or maybe a "firstName"/"lastName" pair (all of them will be optional). The idea is that, in a framework only installation, you don't have the Party/Person entities, but you can create UserLogin records (with associated permissions) to interact with the system. It would be nice to have a mean to add some optional details to the UserLogin.

What do you think?

Jacopo

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to