Hi, IMO, displayName is the good choice to have as this is kind of description field. Another reason is to have displayName is that we have use at many places username as parameters for the userLoginId field which in turn may create confusion in future. +1 for displayName.
-- Rishi Solanki Enterprise Software Developer HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > displayName or userName are both fine with me. What about userLoginName ? > > Jacques > > From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> > > Thank you Ashish and Andrew for the feedback. >> >> displayName sounds a good suggestion; I also like userName, what do you >> think? >> >> To all, can I go on with this change? >> >> Jacopo >> >> >> On Apr 22, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Andrew Zeneski wrote: >> >> This could be a common term called displayName. I'm for it. >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:48 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote: >>> >>> Hello Jacopo, >>>> >>>> I hope you are doing good now a days. :-) >>>> I like the idea of adding a field in UserLogin table. >>>> >>>> But instead of Description or FirstName/ LastName pair I would prefer >>>> to add >>>> field by title "User Name". >>>> It will contain the First Name + Last Name or which ever name is >>>> provided >>>> from the console if we run ant create-admin-user target (we can add >>>> this >>>> option on the available ant target). And it will be Self Explanatory >>>> for >>>> readers I guess. >>>> >>>> Thoughts ? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ashish >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < >>>> jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> What about adding field(s) to the UserLogin entity to describe the >>>>> user >>>>> login record? >>>>> It could be just a "description" field, or maybe a >>>>> "firstName"/"lastName" >>>>> pair (all of them will be optional). >>>>> The idea is that, in a framework only installation, you don't have the >>>>> Party/Person entities, but you can create UserLogin records (with >>>>> associated >>>>> permissions) to interact with the system. >>>>> It would be nice to have a mean to add some optional details to the >>>>> UserLogin. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> >
