displayName or userName are both fine with me. What about userLoginName ?
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
Thank you Ashish and Andrew for the feedback.
displayName sounds a good suggestion; I also like userName, what do
you think?
To all, can I go on with this change?
Jacopo
On Apr 22, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Andrew Zeneski wrote:
This could be a common term called displayName. I'm for it.
Andrew
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:48 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Hello Jacopo,
I hope you are doing good now a days. :-)
I like the idea of adding a field in UserLogin table.
But instead of Description or FirstName/ LastName pair I would
prefer to add
field by title "User Name".
It will contain the First Name + Last Name or which ever name is
provided
from the console if we run ant create-admin-user target (we can add
this
option on the available ant target). And it will be Self
Explanatory for
readers I guess.
Thoughts ?
--
Ashish
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
What about adding field(s) to the UserLogin entity to describe the
user
login record?
It could be just a "description" field, or maybe a
"firstName"/"lastName"
pair (all of them will be optional).
The idea is that, in a framework only installation, you don't have
the
Party/Person entities, but you can create UserLogin records (with
associated
permissions) to interact with the system.
It would be nice to have a mean to add some optional details to the
UserLogin.
What do you think?
Jacopo
