I can't believe we're still having this discussion :-)
+1 for displayName

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 1/05/2009, at 8:59 PM, Rishi Solanki wrote:

Whenever we use userName or something like that (displayUserName) will
definitely create confusions with userLoginId.
As I stated before username parameter is mapped to userLoginId at many
places in ofbiz.
+1 for displayName.

-- Rishi Solanki
Enterprise Software Developer
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:52 AM, David E Jones
<david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>wrote:


Yeah, if we have two alternatives that might be confusing, why not combine them and create a frankenstein option that will _definitely_ be confusing!
;)

I'm for displayName... when people say "user name" they usually mean what
we call "user login ID", so that would be more confusing.

-David



On Apr 30, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

displayUserName ?

Jacques

From: "Andrew Zeneski" <andrew.zene...@hotwaxmedia.com>

Our Crowd server uses displayName (as well as sn, givenName and mail) but that is probably because it is backed by LDAP. Display name gets auto
populated with First/Last name, but is editable.
userName sounds too much like a string to use for login, where
displayName would mean the name to display in the system. If we add this field, we should edit createPersonAndUserLogin server to set the value to First/Last if its empty as well. Then use this field in the header instead
of the party fields.
Andrew
On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

That seems a good reason, what is used in Crowd ? I suggested userName
because it's related to userLogin. What about  displayUserName ?

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@yahoo.com>

displayName is used in LDAP? Sweet! In that case...
+1 for displayName
-Adrian
--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Andrew Zeneski <andrew.zene...@hotwaxmedia.com >
wrote:

From: Andrew Zeneski <andrew.zene...@hotwaxmedia.com>
Subject: Re: Adding description field(s) to the UserLogin entity
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 10:59 PM
displayName is a common field used in LDAP systems. Which is
really the only reason I suggested it. Usually its the
first/last name together but its totally arbitrary.
On Apr 30, 2009, at 1:55 AM, awdesh parihar wrote:
Hi
+1 for name suggested by  jacques , we can also go we
displayUserName.
----
Awdesh Parihar








Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to