I can't believe we're still having this discussion :-) +1 for displayName
Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 1/05/2009, at 8:59 PM, Rishi Solanki wrote:
Whenever we use userName or something like that (displayUserName) will definitely create confusions with userLoginId. As I stated before username parameter is mapped to userLoginId at many places in ofbiz. +1 for displayName.-- Rishi SolankiEnterprise Software Developer HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:52 AM, David E Jones <david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>wrote:Yeah, if we have two alternatives that might be confusing, why not combine them and create a frankenstein option that will _definitely_ be confusing!;)I'm for displayName... when people say "user name" they usually mean whatwe call "user login ID", so that would be more confusing. -David On Apr 30, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: displayUserName ?Jacques From: "Andrew Zeneski" <andrew.zene...@hotwaxmedia.com>Our Crowd server uses displayName (as well as sn, givenName and mail) but that is probably because it is backed by LDAP. Display name gets autopopulated with First/Last name, but is editable. userName sounds too much like a string to use for login, wheredisplayName would mean the name to display in the system. If we add this field, we should edit createPersonAndUserLogin server to set the value to First/Last if its empty as well. Then use this field in the header insteadof the party fields. Andrew On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:That seems a good reason, what is used in Crowd ? I suggested userNamebecause it's related to userLogin. What about displayUserName ? Jacques From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@yahoo.com>displayName is used in LDAP? Sweet! In that case... +1 for displayName -Adrian--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Andrew Zeneski <andrew.zene...@hotwaxmedia.com >wrote:From: Andrew Zeneski <andrew.zene...@hotwaxmedia.com> Subject: Re: Adding description field(s) to the UserLogin entity To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 10:59 PM displayName is a common field used in LDAP systems. Which is really the only reason I suggested it. Usually its the first/last name together but its totally arbitrary. On Apr 30, 2009, at 1:55 AM, awdesh parihar wrote:Hi+1 for name suggested by jacques , we can also go wedisplayUserName.---- Awdesh Parihar
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature