All that means is that artifacts aren't forced to use only the common create, 
update, and delete permissions. As was suggested in the design, a service could 
have an access permission, entities could have a filter permission, etc.

-Adrian

--- On Sat, 5/16/09, Bruno Busco <bruno.bu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Bruno Busco <bruno.bu...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Discussion: Security-Aware Artifacts
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, May 16, 2009, 10:33 PM
> Adrian,
> I added a comment on the Wiki page. I forward it here...
> 
> ---------------
> 
> That's really cool! I can't wait to see it working!
> 
> BTW I can see in the design that an artifact can define an
> own specific
> permission. May be adding a scenario like: "User X can
> perform the artifact
> Y-specific operation W on the artifact Y" could be
> helpfull.
> 
> How the artifact will add its own specific permission?
>  Posted by Bruno Busco <http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/%7Ebruno.busco> at
> May
> 16, 2009 11:14 |
> Permalink<http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/OFBiz+Security+Refactor?focusedCommentId=8091#comment-8091>
> 
> ---------------
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 
> 
> 2009/5/16 Adrian Crum <adrian.c...@yahoo.com>
> 
> >
> > This is a continuation of the security refactoring
> discussion.
> >
> > There is a Wiki page that outlines the design of
> Security-Aware Artifacts:
> >
> > http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/Ch8
> >
> > I started to build out the scenarios, so that we can
> be sure the design
> > meets everyone's needs as expected.
> >
> > David - I'm not sure where each scenario is currently
> implemented. If there
> > is a current implementation you had in mind, please
> let me know and I will
> > update the page.
> >
> > David - I'm not real clear on your dynamic hierarchy
> design, so I tried to
> > guess how it works in the scenario pages. Let me know
> if I'm wrong. Just
> > give me a clear example of how it works (keep in mind
> I'm not inside your
> > head) and I will update the pages.
> >
> > Developers - please review and comment. This will
> effect everyone.
> >
> > -Adrian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 


      

Reply via email to