Yes, I agree and I have started gathering requirements in process form
here:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBREQDES/Story+of+Apache+Open+Source+Project
As a warning/disclaimer: this is FAR from complete and just some stuff
I threw together in a few minutes about a month ago.
As with other UBPL related things this is meant to follow the HEMP
process:
http://www.dejc.com/home/HEMP.html
-David
On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "David E Jones" <d...@me.com>
Wasn't that thread just a general discussion?
Yes, were everyone was pushing his own solution, Tim suggested OFBiz
of course. In his last message Ted Husted spoke about requirements
and creating a Wiki page for summarizing the situation.
One mandatory requirement is to have something like the autoexport
Confluence plugin.
I know there was some sentiment requesting support from others at
the ASF for the idea of using OFBiz as the solution. I don't think
that approach is going to get us very far. In a meritocracy we
need to present a solution that is ready to go, start using it
ourselves, and then introduce it to the rest of the ASF.
That is when the option will be taken seriously and is more likely
to be adopted.
I totally agree and I know it's not an easy task. Like you suggested
for the business part, I think we should set our own requirements
before doing anything and maybe ask for ASF's requirements too.
Then we could begin to design something, what do you think ?
Jacques
-David
On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:38 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
The infra thread were this was spoken about is "CMS for the ASF"
Jacques
From: "David E Jones" <d...@me.com>
Hans was referring to something about infra too, but I'm not
sure what exactly.
What I'm not aware of is:
1. what specific objective are being worked on?
2. are there any issues that we need to bring to the attention
of the board?
-David
On Jun 15, 2009, at 8:09 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
I keep raising up the issue of using OFBiz for Apache
Infrastructure and we've had interesting conversations over
there. Might be good to add it in there for it being
documented ....
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
----- "David E Jones" <d...@me.com> wrote:
I'm not sure what you're referring to... Could you be more
specific?
-David
On Jun 15, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Shouldn't we say anything about using the Apache
infrastructure and
the
usage of OFBiz in the apache environment as was discussed in the
infra
mailing list?
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 16:18 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
Thanks Scott.
-David
On Jun 15, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
+1 Looks good to me, there was a typo that since I've
corrected
(lease -> last)
Regards
Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: "David E Jones" <d...@me.com>
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:57:13 AM (GMT+1000) Auto-
Detected
Subject: ASF Board Report for 2009-06
I just found out a bit ago that the ASF board meeting is this
week,
and not next week as previous announcements had said. That
means
that
the board report is now basically late!
I have thrown a quick one together, and it is available here:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report
+2009-06
I plan to submit the report later today. I apologize for the
short
notice (I thought we had another week for this), but
feedback and
additions are certainly welcome in the next couple/few hours.
-David
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
