Re: Discussion: ExecutionContext

[Tim Ruppert]

David, if you wouldn't mind digging in a bit deeper here for me - to explain it to the laymen - is this backward compatibility issue only a concern for people who are changing the framework and need to upgrade their own instances (vendor branches could be a problem here), or if not, how does this effect the rest of us with customizations / custom applications out there?

Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

On Aug 11, 2009, at 11:55 PM, David E Jones wrote:

I just want to get a better understanding of what's next with changes like this - so, any examples would be great. Thanks.

The general concepts I'm trying to support, and unfortunately these conflict with changing things in a backward-compatible way, are:

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature