From: "Adam Heath" <doo...@brainfood.com>
Scott Gray wrote:
On 2/12/2009, at 9:28 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Chris,
We will support this branch even if it will not be accepted into the
trunk. We will also regularly update it with a trunk version of which we
know it is good. (we actually just did)
Bother. Just because it's in a branch, doesn't mean it is not part of
ofbiz. There is just one repository, it's all ofbiz. All branches,
all tags, all revisions.
These licensing issues should have been fixed before it was ever
committed into the repository.
+1, it shouldn't be in a branch if it doesn't comply with the ASL and if
it doesn't make it into the trunk soon I would prefer to see the branch
removed completely.
Unfortunately, the damage is already done at that point. It exists in
the past, for anyone to see. svn is copy-on-write, you can't change
the past.
I have no problems with just about anything being in a branch. Call
me fucked up, make plans to blow up the world, I don't care. But
Please don't blow up the world :)
Jacques
license issues absolutely *must* be fixed *before* others even see it.
And if others in this community disagree, then I'm sorry, you're
wrong. It's not an ofbiz policy. And even if it were *just* an ofbiz
policy, it's a policy that ofbiz has decided to follow, and being a
member of the community means you agreed to follow it as well.
