Yes, Its true, I have used my privileges to get free license for last two years but never really liked the tool enough to make it my primary IDE, always went back to Eclipse.
More recently Tim suggested this community edition thing and then Jacopo agreed that its much lighter and quicker, So I gave it one more shot. This time I like it. So try community edition, it has everything you need to develop ofbiz. Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/apache-ofbiz-blog/ofbiz-tutorial-custom-components-in-ofbiz/ On Dec 3, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > BTW if memory serves you should be able to get a license for the full version > for free via their open source program. > > Regards > Scott > > On 4/12/2009, at 9:49 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > >> I did try it very briefly a few years back but I'm so used to Eclipse now >> that I'd be pretty reluctant to switch. I will download it at some point >> though and take another look, thanks for the info. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 4/12/2009, at 9:34 AM, Anil Patel wrote: >> >>> Scott, Have your tried IntelliJ, >>> >>> More recent release of IntelliJ Community edition has support for Git. In >>> fact recently I have switched to using IntelliJ and I like it. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards >>> Anil Patel >>> HotWax Media Inc >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/apache-ofbiz-blog/ofbiz-tutorial-custom-components-in-ofbiz/ >>> >>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Joe Eckard wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/12/2009, at 7:32 AM, Adam Heath wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Hans, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When all of this comes across to the trunk could please consider >>>>>>> separating it into at least two commits, one for the integration and >>>>>>> another for all this other stuff. It'll make the commits a little >>>>>>> easier to read especially when people are looking at the commit history. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I've said countless times, git makes this easier. You'd maintain a >>>>>> branch(local clone with maybe a separate local branch). Then, a >>>>>> series of commits in that branch. Git supports history rewriting, so >>>>>> you can do things like push/pop commits and edit them. >>>>>> guilt(git+quilt) can help, there are also other tools that are similiar. >>>>> >>>>> I'm a couple of days into using git locally and I like it so far. >>>>> But there are a couple of things people should be aware of when >>>>> considering the switch: >>>>> - The initial checkout takes a long time (+9 hours on my machine) >>>>> although it only ever has to be done once >>>> >>>> You can pick the revision to start your tracking at with the -r switch to >>>> avoid loading the entire project history. >>>> >>>>> - The learning curve is steeper than with svn >>>>> - The workflows are quite different from svn so be prepared to change the >>>>> way you work >>>>> - Setup on OS X can be a pain (you need XCode tools installed to use the >>>>> git-svn bridge and if you don't have your OS X install DVD handy it's a >>>>> 1GB download) >>>>> - GUI support is limited (e.g. the Eclipse plugin is at v0.6) >>>> >>>> Have you checked out "git gui" and GitX? http://gitx.frim.nl/ >>>> >>>> I use git from the command line, so I'm not sure how well the "git gui" UI >>>> works, but GitX is pretty neat. >>> >> >
