Adam we had this before the move to the infra. I have been making comments since 2004 about bugs and fixes. I got tired of pushing against those that wanted to say it was ok the way it was and do it on mine. Stability is paramount to me. trouble is by the time I have tested mine there changes that nullifies my work to bring it back to the community.
Adam Heath sent the following on 2/5/2010 7:57 AM: > BJ Freeman wrote: >> this is how james deals with nightly builds. >> so it is possible with in the apache infra >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report >> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:34:48 -0500 (EST) >> From: JAMES Nightly Build System <n...@devtech.com> >> Reply-To: James Developers List <server-...@james.apache.org> >> To: JAMES Server Development <server-...@james.apache.org> >> >> An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to >> http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below: >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >> Total time: 4 minutes 38 seconds >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Done. Packages Will Be Uploaded To The Nightly Repository. > > I vote no for this, until there are more test cases. Ofbiz is still > buggy, with old functionality being broken, or new functionality not > even being tested. > > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Please review http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/BUILD.log. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org >> >> >> > >
