Adrian Crum wrote: > Plus, some of the technical work being done in the framework is intended > to make it easier for end-user-oriented contributors to write code. > > The conversion framework is a perfect example: I just wanted to be able > to pass a TimeDuration instance around the framework, but couldn't > because of limitations in the framework. Once the conversion framework > is completely integrated, all developers will be able to pass > user-defined Java types around the framework easily.
And, of course, the webslinger stuff I have started to commit won't nescessarily be used until the final step. This means there will be a window where ofbiz has to maintain the code, with no apparent use case for it. However, what is good, is that Adrian's conversion framework was a more advanced version of a library that webslinger already had, and I was able to convert over to it with relative ease.
