Why would you even bring this up here? No one is talking about commits and definitely no one is talking about reverts.
Regards Scott On 12/03/2010, at 2:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Anyway a sole -1 is enough for reverting code without explanations > Needs 3 +1 (and more + than -) for a release. > These are Apache rules (inherited from HTTPD project) as it's well explained > in the release management document Bruno gave a link) > > Jacques > > From: "Bilgin Ibryam" <bibr...@gmail.com> >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> Hi Hans, >>> >>> I would recommend using the custRequestItem for the story, the >>> implementation can be simple enough by using a service to create the header >>> and item in a single call and a view entity could could them back to you as >>> a single record. Conceptually what you really have is a customer request >>> with a single item. >>> >>> I don't like the idea of modifying the data model when it is already quite >>> capable of meeting your needs. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Scott >>> >> Agreed with Scott. Having two places for the same information will be >> confusing/redundant and such a change should not go to ofbiz svn in that >> case. >> >> Bilgin > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
