After a 2 second glance it looks interesting enough to bookmark. Based on my current wish list I should be able to comment further in 2012 :-)
Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/06/2010, at 1:18 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote: > I think you make a really great point here. JQuery is a utility not a > framework and when it comes to utility it really delivers the goods. > > Looking back to Dojo, I still believe we need something to counter the > GWT-EXT "threat" because users continue to demand an "application" feel > when it comes to ERP. I find Vaadin (vaadin.com) very interesting, if > somewhat daunting in scale. It appears to offer the level of abstraction > necessary to integrate the screen and form widget systems and is under > the Apache License (which makes it very, very interesting). Has anyone > else looked seriously at Vaadin? > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> Looks like we have a good consensus around Jquery so far. >> >> I must say that the main arugment for Dojo was its serious. It's a >> real consistent framework with embedded widgets, not only an API. All >> those third parties Jquery's widgets (and Prototypes's) are a bit >> frightening. On the other hand when you want to upgrade to 1.4 you >> find that it's not as serious as we thought, and I'm *very >> disapointed* about that. And as those widgets are open source, it's >> not as frightening as it 1st seems. For instance, we use a third party >> calendar and we have already poked in (for layered lookups) without >> issues. >> >> At the time we decided to embed Doo and Prototype some pointed also >> Jquery with good arguments [1] [2][3]. At this time we decided that >> anyway we were not tied to any Ajax frameworks yet. >> >> So yes, +1 for me also, especially now that Sascha wants to tackle it, >> and I'm sure we will support his effort! >> >> Thanks guys >> >> Jacques >> [1] Yoav Shapira in 2006: http://markmail.org/message/ftw7pjfrzxyxmsuz >> [2] Ean in 2007 http://markmail.org/message/jf5qvxblvrbmtvae (and we >> know now than when there is a dual licensing we can pick the one we >> want, here MIT :o) >> [3] Ean in 2007 http://markmail.org/message/vqjjtribdrulhbl3. When the >> serious one is less serious than the other (demo in time). Dojo is >> known to have documentation problems also... Found this link >> http://www.ajaxdaddy.com/demo-dojo-fisheye.html > -- > Ean Schuessler, CTO > e...@brainfood.com > 214-720-0700 x 315 > Brainfood, Inc. > http://www.brainfood.com >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
