From: "Adrian Crum" <adri...@hlmksw.com>
This description of events isn't entirely true.
David didn't reject Andrew's design, the community in general felt
excluded from the design process. David simply asked that we discuss the
design before code was committed.
Yes exactly, thanks for clarifying Adrian, I knew I had left some points behind
The security redesign was the outcome of that discussion. As far as I
know, David and I agreed on the final design, but interest in it fell
off. I ended up being the only person working on it. Since then, David
has included the security redesign in his new project.
I tought there were some stumbling blocks, notably when merging your works.
Jacques
-Adrian
On 9/16/2010 12:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
A 1st step would be to show a POC attached to Jira issue; explanation in
comment, sufficient snippet of code to understand in patch. When I work
on such I try to use the Example component to avoid any bad side
effects; ie Example is a kind of sandbox, nobody will jump to your
throat if you make a little mistake. Anyway you would not be the 1st
responsible, as a commiter would have to review and commit before it get
into core.
In one word, show us the case.
It's also good to know that 1st Andrew (Zeneski) tried something on this
(authentication et especially authorization), David "rejected" it, then
Adrian and David tried to work together but finally did not agree. So
there is still an executioncontext branch but it seems almost dead. I'm
maybe not totally right about this, but at least it's how I see it.
Thanks
Jacques
From: "james_sg" <snowme...@hotmail.com>
How can i help on this?
- james
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Looks more like a revolution IMO (ie a branch ;), want to be involved?
Jacques
From: "james_sg" <snowme...@hotmail.com>
Thanks for looking. Moving to Apache Shiro should be an evolution ....
James
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Interesting...
Thanks
Jacques
From: "james_sg" <snowme...@hotmail.com>
Anyone look at Apache Shiro for OFBiz? I have used it in one of my
project
and am happy with it. Seems a nice fit for OFBiz.
-james
Adrian Crum wrote:
Anyone wanting to give the security redesign a try is welcome to do
so.
The Example component is converted over to the new security design,
but
the rest of the applications still use the old-style security.
One of the goals of the redesign was to have it work along side the
old-style security - so OFBiz users can migrate over to the new
design
when time and resources permit. The notion that the redesign would
have
a big impact on existing installations isn't true.
-Adrian
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Security-refactor-tp2537069p2540207.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Security-refactor-tp2537069p2541484.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
