David E Jones wrote: > On Sep 16, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> Completely brand new code that doesn't touch anything else *at all* can be >> committed as a single large chunk. But if you need to alter a bunch of >> other stuff scattered all over, separate commits are better. It makes it >> easier to verify correctness, and helps in 4 years when you are trying to >> figure out why something is broken. > > I agree, it is WAY better to have hundreds of small commits with questionable > code state in between them.
Huh? Questionable code state?
