IMO the best way to go at this point
is to move the ui for the administration of user logins and
permissions from the party to the webtools web application.
In this way, in a framework only setup, we will have some
screens to create new user accounts and administer them. I
don't think that we have to provide screens addressed to
users (not administrators) to manage their user preferences:
the nature of this ui would be too much dependent on the
nature of the custom applications that will be used with the
framework.
Kind regards,
Jacopo
On Dec 18, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
By clicking on the party's name in the header the user
is directed to this
screen:
https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/viewprofile?partyId=admin
Here there are lots of links and information related
to all kind of things:
orders, invoices, visits etc.
In a framework-only installation this screen should
only allow the user to
access to its personal information, password,
preferences etc.
How could we get this?
Could we replace this screen with a (non
user-editable) PortalPage where
every installed application could add their
screenlets?
Thank you,
Bruno
2010/12/16 David E Jones<d...@me.com>
Not really BJ, there is a consensus on making the
framework more (or
totally) independent from the applications and
specialpurpose components.
The only question is the best way to do that, and
it looks like as far as a
general approach goes (moving minimal needed parts
from application
components to framework components) a fair
consensus is being reached
quickly.
Of course, this is helped by lots of previous
discussion on this topic.
-David
On Dec 15, 2010, at 10:47 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
I don't think you will find a consensus so
just need to branch your own
frame work as I did.
=========================
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier
Automation<
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010
10:40 AM:
To clarify, I'm trying to get the
components in the framework folder to
run by themselves - without the components
found in the applications
folder. Some of the framework components
have UIs.
I understand everyone has a different
opinion on what constitutes a
framework, so I don't want to rehash that
discussion. I just want to
disable the components in the applications
folder and still have OFBiz
run.
-Adrian
On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
first question is should there be any
UI activity at the framework
level.
Should not it just be the support to
allow a UI system to put
installed.
when I mean UI I am talking about any
interaction to the user.
=========================
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier
Automation
<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Adrian Crum sent the following on
12/15/2010 9:52 AM:
I'm working on a project that
requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm
trying to get a framework-only
installation to run.
There are a lot of dependencies on
the party and content components.
Removing dependencies on the party
component should be fairly easy.
The
online help system uses the
content component, so that is an issue.
Should we move the content
component to the framework?
-Adrian