Yes, Jacques I'm still working to remove "fail-message" tag from applications and specialpurpose components. If you want to help me to remove it from framework components I will appreciate it.
Thanks Marco >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: jacques.ler...@9business.fr >Data: 22/12/2010 11.43 >A: <dev@ofbiz.apache.org> >Ogg: Re: <fail-message> > >Thanks to Marco's courageous effort, I can remove soon this from my todo list. > >BTW, Marco I can help on the framework part, if you have nothing pending there yet... > >Thanks! > >Jacques > >From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> >> From: "David E Jones" <jone...@hotwaxmedia.com> >>> >>> Are we feeling a little domineering today? >> >> No actually I'm not domineering, simply exhausted. These 500+ changes certainly discouraged me, hence my reaction. I should keep >> cool, and I will... >> >>> Just because internationalizing code is a best practice doesn't mean it's the ONLY practice, and I don't think we want to force >>> it for any and all users of OFBiz (ie those writing their own applications, etc). >>> That's the thing with best practices: we want them and we want to recommend them and for the main code base even ask people to >>> follow them. We also want primary and secondary/other best practices. Still, not being omniscient we don't want to think we >>> know >>> everything and not have any flexibility in the framework. >> >> Yes I was re-thinking about it, and it occured to me that of course we should keep it and simply discourage its usage in OFBiz >> stock >> (yes, you contributors, commiters, ... :o) >> >> Jacques >> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> On Jul 12, 2008, at 2:10 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I think we should deprecate, and at term remove the <fail-message> tag. There are 500+ ot them in current code. They are not >>>> localisable. So for me it's a bad practice, and we should prevent people to use this tag anymore. >>>> I can't see from the top of my head if there are some other aspects in OFBiz which encourage such bad practices (not >>>> localisable). >>>> >>>> What do you think ? >>>> >>>> Jacques >>> >> > > >
