Hans, The OFBiz project can hardly be regarded as an OFBiz Provider. Look at the list of Providers on the site. Then look at the source of their websites and have a feel for how many (besides your company) use OFBiz as a WCM.
There are several solutions in the field providing for website functionality. Some of which including a richer set of functionality and better user experience. Regards, Pierre Op 21 maart 2012 15:03 schreef Hans Bakker <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com>het volgende: > Jacques, > > sure at the time is was up-to-date and this was a proposal how we can use > ofbiz for the website, however because of the strict apache rules it was > not used...but can still be a template for any local ofbiz website..... > > It remains weak: being an 'ofbiz' provider but not using it yourself..... > > Regards, > Hans > > > On 03/21/2012 08:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Hans, >> >> The problem is that it's completly outdated and nobody is able/want to >> maintain it >> >> Just compare with http://ofbiz.apache.org/ which follows ASF rules with >> for instance a TM on Logo, etc. >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Hans Bakker" <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com**> >> >>> ---- then this could be in contrast with the ASF infrastructure offered >>> to the projects. ----- >>> >>> ??? try: >>> http://demo-trunk.ofbiz.**apache.org/ofbiz/<http://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ofbiz/> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Hans >>> >>> On 03/20/2012 06:48 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>> >>>> G) specialpurpose/ofbizwebsite: move to "Attic" >>>>> >>>>> Jacques and Olivier proposed to move it to Extras instead just in >>>> case someone will pick up the work and complete it in the future. >>>> I would like to mention that, if the original goal was "to eat our own >>>> dog food" and run the OFBiz site on it, then this could be in contrast with >>>> the ASF infrastructure offered to the projects. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>> >>> >
