Thank you Hans, the download page is intended to end users and we can't include there links to download code that has not been officially approved; this was an issue we had in the past and the ASF asked us to fix the page in the past. For the trunk all the information is here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html (but that page will have to be converted to html and become "more official"). Jacopo On Apr 7, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > This looks pretty good Jacopo, > > congratulations. > > However no mention of the latest trunk? That should be at least mentioned. > > Regards, > Hans > > On 04/07/2012 11:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> I have now updated the OFBiz download page with a new section containing the >> tentative release schedule for each release: >> >> http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html >> >> Congratulations, we have now a plan (simple but effective and achievable) >> and at least users now have a clear vision of the lifespan of the release >> branch they are using and can plan in advance the migration of their custom >> instance. >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato"<jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> >>>> On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> >>>>> For me also 6 months seems long enough for the 1st official release. I'm >>>>> just afraid: will we have not a lot of work to release so often (relases >>>>> themself, annunciations, site update and especially demos updates) >>>>> Anyway it seems we need to do it, maybe at the expense of other areas we >>>>> are working on (Jiras, users support, etc.) >>>> It will take time for sure but working on releases should be the main goal >>>> of a community within the ASF: a release is the only trusted way to >>>> publish the work we do: if we fix a bug but we do not issue a release the >>>> users will not get real benefit. >>> Sounds logical and good to me. It's time to go ahead regarding our way of >>> doing releases. Some time ago, due to our change of way (less using trunk), >>> I was afraid that committers activity would be lower, but it seems to be >>> steady up... so far... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>>> Jacques >