This is a reasonable compromise. My suggestion for the URL regarding the latest stable release: http(s)://demo.ofbiz.apache.org or: http(s)://demo-ofbiz.apache.org
Regards, Pierre Op 23 april 2012 10:25 schreef Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com > het volgende: > What we could do is still support it but don't link it from main site and > such > Because it's very convenient for committers to have another running trunk > system > > Jacques > > From: "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> > > I agree. >> >> Demo environments is not for OFBiz developers. >> If you want to have an OFBiz developer to have a viewpoint on trunk where >> they can experience what has been changed in trunk I believe that there >> are >> betters means available and in place already (SVN, CI reports, etc) >> >> As far as I can see it, a demo environment of trunk needs to have a >> regular >> (daily?) deployment of code and demo data. This could potentially lead to >> having an upload being done to the demo location at just the moment that a >> OFBiz committer has partially uploaded his commits to trunk and the demo >> breaks during build and anyone (not only OFBiz developers) experiences a >> broken demo. Giving the community unnecessary headaches about fixing the >> demo environment than OFBiz. >> Look at how often Jacques had to step in to look at why demo-trunk had >> been >> broken. >> >> This is not something we should want to have... >> >> Regards, >> >> Pierre >> >> Op 23 april 2012 09:27 schreef Jacopo Cappellato < >> jacopo.cappellato@hotwaxmedia.**com <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>> >> het volgende: >> >> On Apr 23, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: >>> >>> > I also believe that Jacopo said that something is in the rules, >>> regulations >>> > and/or guidelines of the ASF about the same issue. >>> >>> We simply have to make sure it is always clear when a resource is >>> unreleased and intended for OFBiz developers only or released and >>> intended >>> for larger audience. >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >> >>
