But for what I understand the AR and AP applications contain alternative screens to the ones in the main "accounting" application. They are an effort to implement more focused/specific applications versus the more generic "accounting" application. So, the main "accounting" application should already contain both the AR/AP features, but some of its screens could serve both. I would be in favor of the removal if we can make sure that all the features that are removed are still available (even if in a more generic way) in the "accounting" application.
Jacopo On Apr 8, 2012, at 1:23 AM, David E Jones wrote: > > When I first saw the subject I was thinking this as well. > > I always wondered why those were created as separate applications, > perhaps for permission reasons I suppose. In a way they make more sense > as part of the accounting webapp instead of in separate ones. > > -David > > > > Pierre Smits wrote: >> - 1 >> >> Accounts payable (AP) and accounts receivable (AP) are together with the >> ability to process accounting transactions the core ingredients of a good >> FICO solution. Without both any accountant will state that your accounting >> solution is worthless. Without both core accounting components you (as a >> company) would have no overview of money owed to you or that you owe to >> others. >> >> Regards, >> >> Pierre >> >> >> Op 7 april 2012 19:41 schreef Jacques Le Roux >> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>het volgende: >> >>> +1 >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> Anil Patel wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> Like lot of other stuff, I think AR and AP applications should be moved >>>> out of Ofbiz Accounting component. As such they are >>>> special purpose application, but again not core to Ofbiz application >>>> framework. >>>> I recommend we should relocate AR and AP webapplications out of Ofbiz >>>> Accounting to Ofbiz Extras. If we as community agree, I'll >>>> put efforts to complete the job. >>>> Thanks and Regards >>>> Anil Patel >>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>> >>
