I haven't been following all these strange jenkins threads but I have two points: 1. Don't be so aggressive, it'll get you nowhere and is annoying to read. 2. This is a CONFIGURATION file, they exist so that if the provided setup doesn't suit your needs YOU CAN CHANGE IT.
You simply don't change default settings within a release branch, it removes the stability that one should reasonably expect from a release. But for god's sake, these are configuration files, if it doesn't suit then change them to to your heart's content in your downloaded copy. Regards Scott On 21/04/2012, at 8:46 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in > your way. I don't know.... > > As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so > that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can NOT > do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new port > numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production port > numbers) are expected to be not? > > And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the > community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is > asked for by the community.... > > I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and > this community along. > > As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other > threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or > test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read SVN). > But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the > same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through. > > Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug > fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not > going to be implemented in a release. > > Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this > community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of > committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or > guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but > being part of this community) it often seems like your not. > > If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not, > please state so and ..... > > Regards, > > Pierre > > > > > Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux <[email protected] >> het volgende: > >> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported, >> unless there is a consensus in the community. >> >> Thanks >> >> Jacques >> >> >> Author: erwan >>> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012 >>> New Revision: 1328518 >>> >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev> >>> Log: >>> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins >>> >>> Modified: >>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-** >>> containers.xml >>> >>> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-** >>> containers.xml >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/** >>> framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=** >>> 1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff> >>> ==============================**==============================** >>> ================== >>> --- >>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml >>> (original) >>> +++ >>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml >>> Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012 >>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License. >>> >>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server --> >>> <container name="naming-container" class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.* >>> *NamingServiceContainer"> >>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/> >>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/> >>> </container> >>> >>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher --> >>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.** >>> RmiServiceContainer"> >>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/> >>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/> >>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/> >>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/> >>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/> >>> <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.** >>> socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/> >>> <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.** >>> socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/> >>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License. >>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/> >>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/> >>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/> >>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/> >>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/> >>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/> >>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/> >>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/> >>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License. >>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/> >>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/> >>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/> >>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/> >>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/> >>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/> >>> <property name="server" value=""/> >>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/> >>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License. >>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/> >>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/> >>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/> >>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/> >>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/> >>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/> >>> <property name="server" value=""/> >>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/> >>> >>> >>>
