I'm sorry if my first point and the use of capitals for emphasis offended you 
but I think you forget to actually respond to the main point, the 
configurability of a configuration file...

Regards
Scott

On 22/04/2012, at 12:32 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:

> Scott,
> 
> Please see my comments inline.
> 
> 
> Op 21 april 2012 11:35 schreef Scott Gray <[email protected]> het
> volgende:
> 
>> I haven't been following all these strange jenkins threads but I have two
>> points:
>> 
> 
> Maybe you should, so you know what the issue is about.
> 
> 
>> 1. Don't be so aggressive, it'll get you nowhere and is annoying to read.
>> 
> 
> I wasn't. Just defending the case. Let me apologize for everybody who makes
> you feel annoyed.
> 
> 
>> 2. This is a CONFIGURATION file, they exist so that if the provided setup
>> doesn't suit your needs YOU CAN CHANGE IT.
>> 
> 
> Using capitals is in terms of nettique is like shouting. It could be
> perceived as agressive. One could feel annoyed!
> 
> 
>> 
>> You simply don't change default settings within a release branch, it
>> removes the stability that one should reasonably expect from a release.
>> But for god's sake, these are configuration files, if it doesn't suit then
>> change them to to your heart's content in your
> 
> 
> Profanity isn't called for. Be civil!
> 
> 
>> downloaded copy.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Scott
>> 
>> On 21/04/2012, at 8:46 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
>> 
>>> Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in
>>> your way. I don't know....
>>> 
>>> As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so
>>> that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can
>> NOT
>>> do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new
>> port
>>> numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production
>> port
>>> numbers) are expected to be not?
>>> 
>>> And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the
>>> community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is
>>> asked for by the community....
>>> 
>>> I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and
>>> this community along.
>>> 
>>> As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other
>>> threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or
>>> test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read
>> SVN).
>>> But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the
>>> same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through.
>>> 
>>> Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug
>>> fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not
>>> going to be implemented in a release.
>>> 
>>> Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this
>>> community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of
>>> committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or
>>> guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but
>>> being part of this community) it often seems like your not.
>>> 
>>> If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not,
>>> please state so and .....
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Pierre
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux <
>> [email protected]
>>>> het volgende:
>>> 
>>>> Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported,
>>>> unless there is a consensus in the community.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> Jacques
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Author: erwan
>>>>> Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>>>> New Revision: 1328518
>>>>> 
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev<
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev>
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
>>>>> 
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>>>> containers.xml
>>>>> 
>>>>> Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
>>>>> containers.xml
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**
>>>>> framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=**
>>>>> 1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff<
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff
>>> 
>>>>> ==============================**==============================**
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> ---
>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>>>> (original)
>>>>> +++
>> ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
>>>>> Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
>>>>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
>>>>>  <container name="naming-container"
>> class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.*
>>>>> *NamingServiceContainer">
>>>>> -        <property name="port" value="1099"/>
>>>>> +        <property name="port" value="1100"/>
>>>>>  </container>
>>>>> 
>>>>>  <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
>>>>>  <container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>>>> RmiServiceContainer">
>>>>>      <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
>>>>>      <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
>>>>> -        <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
>>>>> +        <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
>>>>>      <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
>>>>>      <property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>>>> socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
>>>>>      <property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
>>>>> socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
>>>>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>>          <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
>>>>>          <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
>>>>>          <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>>>> -            <property name="port" value="8009"/>
>>>>> +            <property name="port" value="8010"/>
>>>>>          <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
>>>>>          <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
>>>>>          <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
>>>>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>>          <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>>>>          <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>>>>          <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>> -            <property name="port" value="8080"/>
>>>>> +            <property name="port" value="8081"/>
>>>>>          <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>>          <property name="server" value=""/>
>>>>>          <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>>>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
>>>>>          <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
>>>>>          <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
>>>>>          <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>> -            <property name="port" value="8443"/>
>>>>> +            <property name="port" value="8444"/>
>>>>>          <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
>>>>>          <property name="server" value=""/>
>>>>>          <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to